Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 6:12:48.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-48.

Arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians

Oliver Hirsch  1 , Heidemarie Keller, Tanja Krones, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Affiliations

Arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians

Oliver Hirsch et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: The successful implementation of decision aids in clinical practice initially depends on how clinicians perceive them. Relatively little is known about the acceptance of decision aids by physicians and factors influencing the implementation of decision aids from their point of view. Our electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) is to be used within the encounter and has a modular structure containing evidence-based decision aids for the following topics: cardiovascular prevention, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, oral antidiabetics, conventional and intensified insulin therapy, and unipolar depression. The aim of our study was to evaluate the acceptance of arriba-lib in primary care physicians.

Methods: We conducted an evaluation study in which 29 primary care physicians included 192 patients. The physician questionnaire contained information on which module was used, how extensive steps of the shared decision making process were discussed, who made the decision, and a subjective appraisal of consultation length. We used generalised estimation equations to measure associations within patient variables and traditional crosstab analyses.

Results: Only a minority of consultations (8.9%) was considered to be unacceptably extended. In 90.6% of consultations, physicians said that a decision could be made. A shared decision was perceived by physicians in 57.1% of consultations. Physicians said that a decision was more likely to be made when therapeutic options were discussed "detailed". Prior experience with decision aids was not a critical variable for implementation within our sample of primary care physicians.

Conclusions: Our study showed that it might be feasible to apply our electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) in the primary care context. Evidence-based decision aids offer support for physicians in the management of medical information. Future studies should monitor the long-term adoption of arriba-lib in primary care physicians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Opening screen of arriba-lib.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Individual risk information with emoticons.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Weigh scales in arriba-lib for the deliberation phase.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Flow chart displaying the recruitment process in the arriba-lib study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. O'Donnell S, Cranney A, Jacobsen MJ, Graham ID, O'Connor AM, Tugwell P. Understanding and overcoming the barriers of implementing patient decision aids in clinical practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006;12(2):174–181. - PubMed
    1. Thistlethwaite J, Evans R, Tie RN, Heal C. Shared decision making and decision aids - a literature review. Aust Fam Physician. 2006;35(7):537–540. - PubMed
    1. Holm S, Davies M. In: Shared decision-making in health care. Edwards A, Elwyn G, editor. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2009. Ethical issues around evidence-based patient choice and shared decision-making.
    1. Barratt A. Evidence Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):407–412. - PubMed
    1. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources