Promoting walking among office employees - evaluation of a randomized controlled intervention with pedometers and e-mail messages
- PMID: 22672576
- PMCID: PMC3444317
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-403
Promoting walking among office employees - evaluation of a randomized controlled intervention with pedometers and e-mail messages
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate a 6-month intervention to promote office-employees' walking with pedometers and e-mail messages.
Methods: Participants were recruited by 10 occupational health care units (OHC) from 20 worksites with 2,230 employees. Voluntary and insufficiently physically active employees (N = 241) were randomized to a pedometer (STEP, N = 123) and a comparison group (COMP, N = 118). STEP included one group meeting, log-monitored pedometer-use and six e-mail messages from OHC. COMP participated in data collection. Reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) and costs were assessed with questionnaires (0, 2, 6, 12 months), process evaluation and interviews (12 months).
Results: The intervention reached 29% (N = 646) of employees in terms of participation willingness. Logistic regression showed that the proportion of walkers tended to increase more in STEP than in COMP at 2 months in "walking for transportation" (Odds ratio 2.12, 95%CI 0.94 to 4.81) and at 6 months in "walking for leisure" (1.86, 95%CI 0.94 to 3.69). Linear model revealed a modest increase in the mean duration of "walking stairs" at 2 and 6 months (Geometric mean ratio 1.26, 95%CI 0.98 to 1.61; 1.27, 0.98 to 1.64). Adoption and implementation succeeded as intended. At 12 months, some traces of the intervention were sustained in 15 worksites, and a slightly higher number of walkers in STEP in comparison with COMP was observed in "walking stairs" (OR 2.24, 95%CI 0.94 to 5.31) and in "walking for leisure" (2.07, 95%CI 0.99 to 4.34). The direct costs of the intervention were 43 Euros per participant.
Conclusions: The findings indicate only modest impact on some indicators of walking. Future studies should invest in reaching the employees, minimizing attrition rate and using objective walking assessment. TRIAL REGISTERATION: ISRCTN79432107.
References
-
- Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC; 2008. www.health.gov/paguidelines/Report/pdf/CommitteeReport.pdf. - PubMed
-
- Helakorpi S, Pajunen T, Jallinoja P, Virtanen S, Uutela A. Health behaviour and health among the Finnish adult population. Spring 2009. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki; 2010. Report 7/2010, 211 pages. http://www.thl.fi/thl-client/pdfs/ce5ee5c1-6df4-44c2-bcd7-c3b735019570.
-
- Marshall AL. Challenges and opportunities for promoting physical activity in workplace. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7:60–66. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous