Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 6;5(1):26.
doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-5-26.

Diagnostic values of ultrasound and the Modified Alvarado Scoring System in acute appendicitis

Affiliations

Diagnostic values of ultrasound and the Modified Alvarado Scoring System in acute appendicitis

Shirzad Nasiri et al. Int J Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis is difficult, and is important for preventing perforation of the appendix and negative appendectomy results. Ultrasound and clinical scoring systems are very helpful in making the diagnosis. Ultrasound is non-invasive, available and cost-effective, and can accomplish more than CT scans. However, there is no certainty about its effect on the clinical outcomes of patients, and it is operator dependent. Counting the neutrophils as a parameter of the Alvarado Scale is not routine in many laboratories, so we decided to evaluate the diagnostic value of the Modified Alvarado Scaling System (MASS) by omitting the neutrophil count and ultrasonography.

Methods: After ethical approval of methodology in Tehran University of Medical Sciences ethical committee, we collected the data. During 9 months, 75 patients with right lower quadrant pain were enrolled in the study, and underwent abdominal ultrasonography and appendectomy, with pathological evaluation of the appendix. The MASS score was calculated for these patients and compared with pathology results.

Results: Fifty-five male and 20 female patients were assessed. Of these patients 89.3% had acute appendicitis. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy rate of ultrasonography was 71.2%, 83.3%, 97.4%, 25% and 72.4%, respectively. By taking a cutoff point of 7 for the MASS score, a sensitivity of 65.7%, specificity of 37.5%, PPV of 89.8%, NPV of 11.5% and accuracy of 62.7% were calculated. Using the cutoff point of 6, a sensitivity of 85.1%, specificity of 25%, PPV of 90.5%, NPV of 16.7% and accuracy of 78.7% were obtained.

Conclusion: Ultrasound provides reliable findings for helping to diagnose acute appendicitis in our hospital. A cutoff point of 6 for the MASS score will yield more sensitivity and a better diagnosis of appendicitis, though with an increase in negative appendectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Modified Alvarado Scoring System with cutoff points of 6 and 7.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curve for diagnosis of acute appendicitis according to the Modified Alvarado Scoring System. The area under the curve is 0.837 with a standard error of 0.67 and confidence interval of 0.705 to 0.968.

References

    1. Binnebösel M, Otto J, Stumpf M, Mahnken AH, Gassler N, Schumpelick V, Truong S. Acute appendicitis. Modern diagnostics–surgical ultrasound. Chirurg. 2009;80(7):579–587. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1684-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan I, Bicknell SG, Graham M. Utility and diagnostic accuracy of sonography in detecting appendicitis in a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(6):1809–1812. - PubMed
    1. Gökçe AH, Aren A, Gökçe FS, Dursun N, Barut AY. Reliability of ultrasonography for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011;17(1):19–22. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2011.82195. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flum DR, McClure TD, Morris A, Koepsell T. Misdiagnosis of appendicitis and the use of diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:933. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.04.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones PF. Active observation in the management of acute abdominal pain in childhood. BMJ. 1976;2, No. 6035:551–553. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources