Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 1;29(6):1003-16.
doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.29.001003.

Objective assessment of image quality. V. Photon-counting detectors and list-mode data

Affiliations

Objective assessment of image quality. V. Photon-counting detectors and list-mode data

Luca Caucci et al. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. .

Abstract

A theoretical framework for detection or discrimination tasks with list-mode data is developed. The object and imaging system are rigorously modeled via three random mechanisms: randomness of the object being imaged, randomness in the attribute vectors, and, finally, randomness in the attribute vector estimates due to noise in the detector outputs. By considering the list-mode data themselves, the theory developed in this paper yields a manageable expression for the likelihood of the list-mode data given the object being imaged. This, in turn, leads to an expression for the optimal Bayesian discriminant. Figures of merit for detection tasks via the ideal and optimal linear observers are derived. A concrete example discusses detection performance of the optimal linear observer for the case of a known signal buried in a random lumpy background.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Plots of SNR2 for three different cases. For all plots, Δf0 = 100 s−1, f0 = 1000 s−1, p = 20000 m−2, σ = 0.001 m, and rb = 0.005 m. For the solid curves, rs = 0.0045 m; for the dashed curves, rs = rb = 0.0050 m; and, finally, for the dash-dotted curves rs = 0.0055 m. Thick curves corresponds to the SNR2 for the Hotelling observer, while thin curves to the MCMC-calculated SNR2 for the ideal observer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barrett HH. Objective assessment of image quality: Effects of quantum noise and object variability. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 1990;7:1266–1278. - PubMed
    1. Barrett HH, Denny JL, Wagner RF, Myers KJ. Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fissher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 1995;12:834–852. - PubMed
    1. Barrett HH, Abbey CK, Clarkson E. Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 1998;15:1520–1535. - PubMed
    1. Barrett HH, Myers KJ, Devaney N, Dainty C. Objective assessment of image quality. IV. Application to adaptive optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 2006;23:3080–3105. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett HH, Myers KJ. Foundations of Image Science. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2004.

Publication types