Validation of two age dependent D-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis
- PMID: 22674922
- PMCID: PMC3368485
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e2985
Validation of two age dependent D-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the use of age adapted D-dimer cut-off values can be translated to primary care patients who are suspected of deep vein thrombosis.
Design: Retrospective, cross sectional diagnostic study.
Setting: 110 primary care doctors affiliated with three hospitals in the Netherlands.
Participants: 1374 consecutive patients (936 (68.1%) aged >50 years) with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis.
Main outcome measures: Proportion of patients with D-dimer values below two proposed age adapted cut-off levels (age in years × 10 μg/L in patients aged >50 years, or 750 μg/L in patients aged ≥ 60 years), in whom deep vein thrombosis could be excluded; and the number of false negative results.
Results: Using the Wells score, 647 patients had an unlikely clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis. In these patients (at all ages), deep vein thrombosis could be excluded in 309 (47.8%) using the age dependent cut-off value compared with 272 (42.0%) using the conventional cut-off value of 500 μg/L (increase 5.7%, 95% confidence interval 4.1% to 7.8%). This exclusion rate resulted in 0.5% and 0.3% false negative cases, respectively (increase 0.2%, 0.004% to 8.6%).The increase in exclusion rate by using the age dependent cut-off value was highest in the oldest patients. In patients older than 80 years, deep vein thrombosis could be safely excluded in 22 (35.5%) patients using the age dependent cut-off value compared with 13 (21.0%) using the conventional cut-off value (increase 14.5%, 6.8% to 25.8%). Compared with the age dependent cut-off value, the cut-off value of 750 μg/L had a similar exclusion rate (307 (47.4%) patients) and false negative rate (0.3%).
Conclusions: Combined with a low clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis, use of the age dependent D-dimer cut-off value for patients older than 50 years or the cut-off value of 750 μg/L for patients aged 60 years and older resulted in a considerable increase in the proportion of patients in primary care in whom deep vein thrombosis could be safely excluded, compared with the conventional cut-off value of 500 μg/L.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at
Comment in
-
[Higher limits for d-dimer in older patients for thrombosis exclusion].Praxis (Bern 1994). 2012 Sep 19;101(19):1275-6. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a001047. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2012. PMID: 22991153 German. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Using an age-dependent D-dimer cut-off value increases the number of older patients in whom deep vein thrombosis can be safely excluded.Haematologica. 2012 Oct;97(10):1507-13. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.060657. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Haematologica. 2012. PMID: 22511491 Free PMC article.
-
D-dimer use for deep venous thrombosis exclusion in elderly patients: a comparative analysis of three different approaches to establish cut-off values for an assay with results expressed in D-dimer units.Int J Lab Hematol. 2014 Oct;36(5):541-7. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12184. Epub 2014 Jan 16. Int J Lab Hematol. 2014. PMID: 24428869
-
Age-adjusted D-dimer for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.Phlebology. 2018 Aug;33(7):458-463. doi: 10.1177/0268355517718762. Epub 2017 Jul 5. Phlebology. 2018. PMID: 28679312
-
Exclusion of deep vein thrombosis using the Wells rule in clinically important subgroups: individual patient data meta-analysis.BMJ. 2014 Mar 10;348:g1340. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1340. BMJ. 2014. PMID: 24615063 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[A national Danish guideline for age-adjusted fibrin D-dimer cut-off values in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis].Ugeskr Laeger. 2018 Apr 9;180(15):V10170751. Ugeskr Laeger. 2018. PMID: 29690986 Review. Danish.
Cited by
-
Age-Adjusted and Clinical Probability Adapted D-Dimer Cutoffs to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism: A Narrative Review of Clinical Trials.J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 12;13(12):3441. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123441. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38929970 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Age-adjusted D-Dimer Thresholds Combined with the Modified Wells Score as a Predictor of Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis.Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231221141. doi: 10.1177/10760296231221141. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023. PMID: 38099820 Free PMC article.
-
Plasma Siglec-5 and CD163 as Novel Biomarkers for Fulminant Myocarditis.Biomedicines. 2022 Nov 15;10(11):2941. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112941. Biomedicines. 2022. PMID: 36428509 Free PMC article.
-
[Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs to diagnose thromboembolic events: validation in an emergency department].Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2014 Mar;109(2):121-8. doi: 10.1007/s00063-013-0265-8. Epub 2013 Jul 13. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2014. PMID: 23846173 German.
-
A computational approach to compare regression modelling strategies in prediction research.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Aug 25;16(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0209-0. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016. PMID: 27557642 Free PMC article.
References
-
- White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003;107:23(suppl 1):I4-8. - PubMed
-
- Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ III. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:585-93. - PubMed
-
- Anderson FA Jr, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, Hosmer DW, Patwardhan NA, Jovanovic B, et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:933-8. - PubMed
-
- Siccama RN, Janssen KJ, Verheijden NA, Oudega R, Bax L, van Delden JJ, et al. Systematic review: diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules for venous thromboembolism in elderly. Ageing Res Rev 2011;10:304-13. - PubMed
-
- Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, Olson RE, Ghali WA, Brant R, et al. D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:589-602. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical