Situationally-sensitive knowledge translation and relational decision making in hyperacute stroke: a qualitative study
- PMID: 22675477
- PMCID: PMC3365903
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037066
Situationally-sensitive knowledge translation and relational decision making in hyperacute stroke: a qualitative study
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of disability. Early treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with rtPA reduces the risk of longer term dependency but carries an increased risk of causing immediate bleeding complications. To understand the challenges of knowledge translation and decision making about treatment with rtPA in hyperacute stroke and hence to inform development of appropriate decision support we interviewed patients, their family and health professionals. The emergency setting and the symptomatic effects of hyper-acute stroke shaped the form, content and manner of knowledge translation to support decision making. Decision making about rtPA in hyperacute stroke presented three conundrums for patients, family and clinicians. 1) How to allow time for reflection in a severely time-limited setting. 2) How to facilitate knowledge translation regarding important treatment risks and benefits when patient and family capacity is blunted by the effects and shock of stroke. 3) How to ensure patient and family views are taken into account when the situation produces reliance on the expertise of clinicians. Strategies adopted to meet these conundrums were fourfold: face to face communication; shaping decisions; incremental provision of information; and communication tailored to the individual patient. Relational forms of interaction were understood to engender trust and allay anxiety. Shaping decisions with patients was understood as an expression of confidence by clinicians that helped alleviate anxiety and offered hope and reassurance to patients and their family experiencing the shock of the stroke event. Neutral presentations of information and treatment options promoted uncertainty and contributed to anxiety. 'Drip feeding' information created moments for reflection: clinicians literally made time. Tailoring information to the particular patient and family situation allowed clinicians to account for social and emotional contexts. The principal responses to the challenges of decision making about rtPA in hyperacute stroke were relational decision support and situationally-sensitive knowledge translation.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- National Audit Office. London; 2005. Reducing Brain Damage: Faster access to better stroke care; Department of Health, editor.
-
- Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Dávalos A, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. New Engl J Med. 2008;359:1317. - PubMed
-
- Ciccone A. Consent to thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: from trial to practice. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:375–378. - PubMed
-
- Rosenbaum JR, Bravata DM, Concato J, Brass LM, Kim N, et al. Informed consent for thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke treated in routine clinical practice. Stroke. 2004;35:e353. - PubMed
-
- Lang ES, Wyer PC, Eskin B, Tselios C, Afilalo M, et al. The development of the Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference project on knowledge translation. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:919–923. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical