Return of research results from pharmacogenomic versus disease susceptibility studies: what's drugs got to do with it?
- PMID: 22676197
- PMCID: PMC4539533
- DOI: 10.2217/pgs.12.59
Return of research results from pharmacogenomic versus disease susceptibility studies: what's drugs got to do with it?
Abstract
One of the most controversial ethical issues in genomics research is the return of individual research results to research subjects. As new technologies, including whole-genome sequencing, provide an increased opportunity for researchers to find clinically relevant research results, the questions related to if, when and how individual research results should be returned become more central to the ethical conduct of genomic research. In the absence of federal guidance on this issue, many groups and individuals have developed recommendations and suggestions to address these questions. Most of these recommendations have focused on the return of individual results from disease susceptibility studies. However, in addition to predicting the development of disease, genomic research also includes predicting an individual's response to drugs, especially the risk of developing adverse events. This article evaluates and compares the return of individual research results from disease susceptibility studies versus pharmacogenomic studies.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Disclosure of individual pharmacogenomic results in research projects: when and what kind of information to return to research participants.Pharmacogenomics. 2013 Apr;14(6):675-88. doi: 10.2217/pgs.13.50. Pharmacogenomics. 2013. PMID: 23570470 Review.
-
Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jun 5;94(6):818-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 8. Am J Hum Genet. 2014. PMID: 24814192 Free PMC article.
-
The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):473-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.10. Epub 2012 Feb 9. Genet Med. 2012. PMID: 22323070 Free PMC article.
-
Opportunities and challenges for the integration of massively parallel genomic sequencing into clinical practice: lessons from the ClinSeq project.Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):393-8. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.78. Epub 2012 Feb 16. Genet Med. 2012. PMID: 22344227 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical implications of the use of whole genome methods in medical research.Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Apr;18(4):398-403. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.191. Epub 2009 Nov 4. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010. PMID: 19888293 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Willingness to participate in genomics research and desire for personal results among underrepresented minority patients: a structured interview study.J Community Genet. 2013 Oct;4(4):469-82. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0154-0. Epub 2013 Jun 22. J Community Genet. 2013. PMID: 23794263 Free PMC article.
-
A Pilot Study for Return of Individual Pharmacogenomic Results to Population-Based Cohort Study Participants.JMA J. 2022 Apr 15;5(2):177-189. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2021-0156. Epub 2022 Mar 11. JMA J. 2022. PMID: 35611229 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Utility of Oncuria™, a Multiplexed Liquid Biopsy for the Non-Invasive Detection of Bladder Cancer-A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 6;12(1):131. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010131. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35054300 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dressler LG. Disclosure of research results from cancer genomic studies: state of the science. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(13):4270–4276. Systematic review of common themes, areas of controversy and remaining gaps of recommendations and guidelines from federal agencies (NIH, NCI, DOD, NHGRI and OHRP), advisory groups (National Bioethics Advisory Committee) and advocacy groups (National Action Plan on Breast Cancer) regarding the process and conditions for returning genetic or genomic research results. - PubMed
-
- Fabsitz RR, Mcguire A, Sharp RR, et al. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010;3(6):574–580. A 28-member multidisciplinary working group was assembled by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute in early 2009 to update previous recommendations (2004) on the same topic. The working group produced five recommendations, two of which address the criteria necessary to determine when genetic results should and may be returned to study participants. These two criteria are used to guide the assessment in this paper. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Berg JS, Khoury MJ, Evans JP. Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genet Med. 2011;13(6):499–504. Excellent analysis of the return of incidental findings from whole-genome sequencing in the context of a clinical environment and clinical care. - PubMed
-
- Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP, Nelson CA, et al. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36(2):219–248. 211. Seminal article on return of incidental findings from genetic and genomic research. Led by SM Wolf, a national group of experts was assembled to address this issue. Recommendations were proposed based on a net-benefit approach to the research participant. - PMC - PubMed
Websites
-
- [Accessed 1 December 2011];NIH genome-wide association studies. http://gwas.nih.gov/pdf/PTC_for_IRBs_and_Institutions_revised5-31-11.pdf. NIH points to consider for IRBs and institutions in their review of data submission plans for institutional certifications. Under NIH’s policy for sharing of data obtained in NIH supported or conducted genome-wide association studies.
-
- National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) Research involving human biological materials: ethical issues and policy guidance – Volume 1. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. [Accessed 5 December 2011];1999 http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/hbm.pdf.
-
- [Accessed 10 May 2012];Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment of 1988. Statute 102, PL100-578. www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/IVDRegulatoryAssi....
-
- CDC, Public Health Genomics. [Accessed 1 December 2011];ACCE Model Process for Evaluating Genetic Tests. www.cdc.gov/genomics/gtesting/ACCE.
-
- CDC, Public Health Genomics. [Accessed 1 December 2011];Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP™) www.cdc.gov/genomics/gtesting/EGAPP/index.htm.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials