Nurse-perceived barriers to effective communication regarding prognosis and optimal end-of-life care for surgical ICU patients: a qualitative exploration
- PMID: 22676315
- PMCID: PMC3396137
- DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0481
Nurse-perceived barriers to effective communication regarding prognosis and optimal end-of-life care for surgical ICU patients: a qualitative exploration
Abstract
Background: Integration of palliative care for intensive care unit (ICU) patients is important but often challenging, especially in surgical ICUs (SICUs), in part because many surgeons equate palliative care with terminal care and failure of restorative care. SICU nurses, who are key front-line clinicians, can provide insights into barriers for delivery of optimal palliative care in their setting.
Methods: We developed a focus group guide to identify barriers to two key components of palliative care-optimal communication regarding prognosis and optimal end-of-life care-and used the tool to conduct focus groups of nurses providing bedside care in three SICUs at a tertiary care, academic, inner city hospital. Using content analysis technique, responses were organized into thematic domains that were validated by independent observers and a subset of participating nurses.
Results: Four focus groups included a total of 32 SICU nurses. They identified 34 barriers to optimal communication regarding prognosis, which were summarized into four domains: logistics, clinician discomfort with discussing prognosis, inadequate skill and training, and fear of conflict. For optimal end-of-life care, the groups identified 24 barriers in four domains: logistics, inability to acknowledge an end-of-life situation, inadequate skill and training, and cultural differences relating to end-of-life care.
Conclusions: Nurses providing bedside care in SICUs identify barriers in several domains that may impede optimal discussions of prognoses and end-of-life care for patients with surgical critical illness. Consideration of these perceived barriers and the underlying SICU culture is relevant for designing interventions to improve palliative care in this setting.
References
-
- Angus DC. Barnato AE. Linde-Zwirble WT. Weissfeld LA. Watson RS. Rickert T. Rubenfeld GD Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ICU End-Of-Life Peer Group. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the united states: An epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:638–643. - PubMed
-
- Lanken PN. Terry PB. Delisser HM. Fahy BF. Hansen-Flaschen J. Heffner JE. Levy M. Mularski RA. Osborne ML. Prendergast TJ. Rocker G. Sibbald WJ. Wilfond B. Yankaskas JR. ATS End-of-Life Care Task Force: An official American Thoracic Society clinical policy statement: Palliative care for patients with respiratory diseases and critical illnesses. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:912–927. - PubMed
-
- Mularski RA. Curtis JR. Billings JA. Burt R. Byock I. Fuhrman C. Mosenthal AC. Medina J. Ray DE. Rubenfeld GD. Schneiderman LJ. Treece PD. Truog RD. Levy MM. Proposed quality measures for palliative care in the critically ill: A consensus from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation critical care workgroup. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:S404–411. - PubMed
-
- Truog RD. Campbell ML. Curtis JR. Haas CE. Luce JM. Rubenfeld GD. Rushton CH. Kaufman DC. American Academy of Critical Care Medicine: Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: A consensus statement by the American College [corrected] of critical care medicine. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:953–963. - PubMed
-
- Adams K, editor; Corrigan JM, editor. Priority Areans for National Action: Transforming Health Care Quality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2003. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical