The evolution of prenatal screening and diagnosis and its impact on an unselected population over an 18-year period
- PMID: 22676508
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03373.x
The evolution of prenatal screening and diagnosis and its impact on an unselected population over an 18-year period
Abstract
Objective: To review changes in and impact of prenatal screening and diagnosis.
Design: Population-based congenital anomaly register study.
Setting: Oxfordshire.
Population: Congenital anomalies confirmed and those suspected prenatally, delivered 1991-2008.
Methods: Analysis of proportions of congenital anomalies confirmed and those suspected prenatally.
Main outcome measures: Birth prevalence, prenatal detection rates, pregnancy outcomes.
Results: A total of 2651 (2.3%) infants/fetuses had a congenital anomaly diagnosed. There were 3839 suspected or confirmed cases, 2847 due to a prenatal suspicion, of which 1659 had an anomaly confirmed at delivery, and 1188 false-positive diagnoses, 91% due to reporting ultrasound normal variants. The percentage of prenatal notifications rose from 48% in 1991-93 to 83-88% from 1996 to 2003 and dropped to 61% in 2006-08, partly reflecting changes in the reporting of normal variants. Reporting these increased the prenatal diagnosis rate from 53 to 63% with an increase in false-positive rate from 0.09 to 1.04%. A total of 722 (44% of prenatally detected affected fetuses) resulted in termination; 48% of these had chromosome anomalies, 34% had isolated structural anomalies, 7% had multiple anomalies, 10% had familial disorders; 42% had lethal anomalies and 58% would probably have survived the neonatal period giving an estimated 20% reduction in birth prevalence of congenital anomalies compatible with survival because of terminations.
Conclusion: There has been an improvement in prenatal detection of congenital anomalies over the two decades studied. The recognition that reporting normal variants, although increasing prenatal detection rates, leads to an increase in false-positive diagnoses has had an impact on practice that has redressed the balance between these two effects.
© 2012 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2012 RCOG.
Similar articles
-
Impact of prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound on the prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth in southern France.J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Jun;48(3):290-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.3.290. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994. PMID: 8051530 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study in Western Australia.Pediatrics. 2005 Sep;116(3):e356-63. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2845. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 16140678
-
6-year experience of prenatal diagnosis in an unselected population in Oxford, UK.Lancet. 1998 Nov 14;352(9140):1577-81. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03202-4. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9843102
-
Comprehensive ultrasound examination in a private perinatal practice.Am J Perinatol. 1995 Nov;12(6):385-91. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994504. Am J Perinatol. 1995. PMID: 8579646 Review.
-
Ultrasound screening for fetal structural anomalies.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Apr;5(2):204-10. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8490090 Review.
Cited by
-
Advancing precision care in pregnancy through a treatable fetal findings list.Am J Hum Genet. 2025 Jun 5;112(6):1251-1269. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.03.011. Epub 2025 Apr 9. Am J Hum Genet. 2025. PMID: 40209713 Review.
-
Renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia type 2: Perinatal lethal condition or a multisystemic disorder with variable expressivity.Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2023 Apr;11(4):e2135. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2135. Epub 2023 Feb 8. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2023. PMID: 36756677 Free PMC article. Review.
-
False positive morphologic diagnoses at the anomaly scan: marginal or real problem, a population-based cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Mar 24;14:112. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-112. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 24655605 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound screening for fetal structural abnormalities during the first and second trimester of pregnancy in low-risk and unselected populations.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 9;5(5):CD014715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014715.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38721874 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Do online decision aids reflect new prenatal screening and testing options? An environmental scan and content analysis.PEC Innov. 2022 Apr 14;1:100038. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100038. eCollection 2022 Dec. PEC Innov. 2022. PMID: 37213778 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical