Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jun;87(6):571-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.03.006.

Positron emission tomographic scans in lymphoma: convention and controversy

Affiliations
Review

Positron emission tomographic scans in lymphoma: convention and controversy

Stephen M Ansell et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

The use of sensitive and specific imaging techniques for accurate initial staging and evaluation of response to therapy in patients with lymphoma is essential for their optimal management. Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) integrated with computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a powerful imaging tool and is being routinely used in staging, response evaluation, and posttreatment surveillance in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. PET/CT is currently widely used in clinical practice, but the established clinical benefit is currently restricted to the posttreatment evaluation of Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma. Although used in other histologic subtypes and in other clinical situations including response assessment, its impact on patient outcome remains to be demonstrated. We performed a literature search of PubMed from 1999 to 2011 using the following keywords: PET scan, FDG-PET, PET/CT, lymphoma. This review addresses the challenges and controversies in the use of PET/CT scans in the management of patients with lymphoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rodriguez-Vigil B., Gomez-Leon N., Pinilla I. PET/CT in lymphoma: prospective study of enhanced full-dose PET/CT versus unenhanced low-dose PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(10):1643–1648. - PubMed
    1. Lee T.S., Ahn S.H., Moon B.S. Comparison of 18F-FDG, 18F-FET and 18F-FLT for differentiation between tumor and inflammation in rats. Nucl Med Biol. 2009;36(6):681–686. - PubMed
    1. Nanni C., Fantini L., Nicolini S., Fanti S. Non FDG PET. Clin Radiol. 2010;65(7):536–548. - PubMed
    1. Herrmann K., Wieder H.A., Buck A.K. Early response assessment using 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography in high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(12):3552–3558. - PubMed
    1. André M., Vander Borght T., Bosly A. Interim FDG-PET scan in Hodgkin's lymphoma: hopes and caveats. Adv Hematol. 2011;2011:430679. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts