Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012;159(2):179-82.
doi: 10.1159/000336391. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

The safety of peanut oral immunotherapy in peanut-allergic subjects in a single-center trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The safety of peanut oral immunotherapy in peanut-allergic subjects in a single-center trial

G P Yu et al. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2012.

Abstract

Background: Peanut allergy is the leading cause of food-related anaphylaxis, and accidental exposures are common. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has been posited as a potential treatment.

Methods: Patients aged 3-65 years with peanut-specific IgE ≥7 kU/l and/or a positive skin prick test with a history of an allergic reaction to peanut were recruited to undergo an OIT protocol. All adverse reactions were recorded by research staff or patients in real time.

Results: Twenty-four patients received 6,662 doses. Symptoms were mostly mild (84%), and only 3 severe gastrointestinal reactions required the administration of epinephrine. Abdominal pain was the most common reaction, followed by oropharyngeal and lip pruritus. Respiratory symptoms were rare.

Conclusions: In this trial of OIT in adults and children, most reactions were mild.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Total number of symptoms are depicted by type of symptom and in what situation the reaction occurred (during the modified rush day, during a dose escalation appointment or at home).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The above graph demonstrates the percentage of doses at each dose level that resulted in any reaction (line). Reactions are categorized by the patient (for home doses) or practitioner (for doses in the CTRU) as mild, moderate, or severe. (8) Doses on the X axis are in milligrams of peanut protein.

References

    1. Sicherer SH. Epidemiology of food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127:594–602. - PubMed
    1. Bock SA, Munoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA. Further fatalities caused by anaphylactic reactions to food, 2001–2006. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Apr;119(4):1016–8. - PubMed
    1. Boyce JA, Assa’ad A, Burks AW, Jones SM, Sampson HA, Wood RA, et al. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Allergy in the United States: Report of the NIAID-Sponsored Expert Panel. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:S1–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark S, Espinola J, Rudders S, Banerjie A, Camargo C. Frequency of US emergency department visits for food-related acute allergic reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127:682–683. - PubMed
    1. Branum AM, Lukacs SL. Food Allergy Among Children in the United States. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1549–1555. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms