Differential effects of comorbidity on antihypertensive and glucose-regulating treatment in diabetes mellitus--a cohort study
- PMID: 22679516
- PMCID: PMC3367971
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038707
Differential effects of comorbidity on antihypertensive and glucose-regulating treatment in diabetes mellitus--a cohort study
Abstract
Background: Comorbidity is often mentioned as interfering with "optimal" treatment decisions in diabetes care. It is suggested that diabetes-related comorbidity will increase adequate treatment, whereas diabetes-unrelated comorbidity may decrease this process of care. We hypothesized that these effects differ according to expected priority of the conditions.
Methods: We evaluated the relationship between comorbidity and treatment intensification in a study of 11,248 type 2 diabetes patients using the GIANTT (Groningen Initiative to Analyse type 2 diabetes Treatment) database. We formed a cohort of patients with a systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg (6,820 hypertensive diabetics), and a cohort of patients with an HbA1c ≥ 7% (3,589 hyperglycemic diabetics) in 2007. We differentiated comorbidity by diabetes-related or unrelated conditions and by priority. High priority conditions include conditions that are life-interfering, incident or requiring new medication treatment. We performed Cox regression analyses to assess association with treatment intensification, defined as dose increase, start, or addition of drugs.
Results: In both the hypertensive and hyperglycemic cohort, only patients with incident diabetes-related comorbidity had a higher chance of treatment intensification (HR 4.48, 2.33-8.62 (p<0.001) for hypertensives; HR 2.37, 1.09-5.17 (p = 0.030) for hyperglycemics). Intensification of hypertension treatment was less likely when a new glucose-regulating drug was prescribed (HR 0.24, 0.06-0.97 (p = 0.046)). None of the prevalent or unrelated comorbidity was significantly associated with treatment intensification.
Conclusions: Diabetes-related comorbidity induced better risk factor treatment only for incident cases, implying that appropriate care is provided more often when complications occur. Diabetes-unrelated comorbidity did not affect hypertension or hyperglycemia management, even when it was incident or life-interfering. Thus, the observed "undertreatment" in diabetes care cannot be explained by constraints caused by such comorbidity.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Voorham J, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, van der Meer K, de Zeeuw D, Wolffenbuttel BH. Identifying targets to improve treatment in type 2 diabetes; the Groningen Initiative to aNalyse Type 2 diabetes Treatment (GIANTT) observational study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19:1086. - PubMed
-
- Voorham J, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, Wolffenbuttel BH, Stolk RP, Denig P. Cardiometabolic treatment decisions in patients with type 2 diabetes: the role of repeated measurements and medication burden. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:415. - PubMed
-
- Conwell LJ, Boult C. The effects of complications and comorbidities on the quality of preventive diabetes care: a literature review. Popul Health Manag. 2008;11:228. - PubMed
-
- Piette JD, Kerr EA. The impact of comorbid chronic conditions on diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:731. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
