Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;40(6):560-6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00704.x. Epub 2012 Jun 9.

Dietary pattern and oral cancer risk--a factor analysis study

Affiliations

Dietary pattern and oral cancer risk--a factor analysis study

Lee Ching Helen-Ng et al. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: The role of diet in cancer risk has mainly been investigated based on intake of individual food items. However, food consumption is made up of a combination of various food items. This study aims to determine the association of dietary patterns with oral cancer risk.

Methods: A total of 306 matched cases and controls were recruited in this study. Data on dietary intake were obtained using food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Factor analysis (FA) was performed to identify dietary patterns based on the intake of nine major food groups, resulting in four factors/components being retained. The odds ratio (OR) was computed for each component using conditional logistic regression.

Results: The first pattern labelled as 'modern' was loaded with processed foods and snacks, whereas the second pattern termed as 'prudent' was characterized by intake of fruits and vegetables. The third pattern labelled as 'traditional' consisted of beverages and starches, while the fourth pattern termed as 'combination' was loaded with intakes of dairy, fermented/salted and meat/by-products. A significant reduced risk was found for 'prudent' (OR 0.53, 95% CI = 0.28-0.98), whereas an increased risk was found for both 'combination' (OR 2.43, 95% CI = 1.33-4.45) and 'traditional' (OR 2.32, 95% CI = 1.23-4.25) patterns. However, after adjusting for risk habits of tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and betel quid chewing, only 'combination' (aOR 2.99, 95% CI = 1.55-5.75) and 'traditional' (aOR 2.08, 95% CI = 1.09-3.97) patterns remained significant.

Conclusion: Consumption in the highest tertile of 'traditional' and 'combination' patterns may induce twice and thrice the risk of oral cancer, respectively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources