Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Mar;13(3):173-81.
doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00575.x. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

Relationship of negative affect and outcome of an opioid therapy trial among low back pain patients

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Relationship of negative affect and outcome of an opioid therapy trial among low back pain patients

Robert N Jamison et al. Pain Pract. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with chronic noncancer pain frequently report symptoms of depression and anxiety (negative affect), which are associated with higher ratings of pain intensity and a greater likelihood of being prescribed chronic opioid therapy. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to test the hypothesis that initial levels of negative affect can predict treatment-related outcomes in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of extended-release (ER) hydromorphone among opioid-tolerant patients with chronic low back pain.

Methods: Four hundred fifty-nine (N = 459) patients participated in the titration/conversion phase of a multicenter study, of which 268 were randomized to receive once-daily hydromorphone or placebo. All patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at baseline and were divided evenly into Low (N = 157), Moderate (N = 155), and High (N = 147) negative affect groups based on their scores. Group differences in numerical pain intensity measures at home and in the clinic, Roland-Morris Disability ratings, and measures of symptoms from the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) throughout the trial were analyzed.

Results: Two hundred sixty-eight of the initial 459 subjects who entered the 2 to 4-week titration/conversion phase (pretreatment) were successfully randomized to either placebo or ER hydromorphone; a total of 110 patients then completed this double-blind phase of the study. Those in the Moderate and High negative affect groups tended to drop out more often during the titration/conversion phase because of the adverse effects or lack of efficacy of their prescribed opioid than those in the Low negative mood group (P < 0.05). Overall, those patients in the Moderate and High groups reported significantly higher pain intensity scores in at-home and in-clinic pain intensity ratings (P < 0.05), greater disability on the Roland-Morris Scale (P < 0.01), and more withdrawal symptoms on the SOWS (P < 0.05) than those in the Low group. Higher negative affect scores also predicted less favorable ratings of the study drug during the titration phase (P < 0.05). Interestingly, the High negative affect group showed the most improvement in pain in the placebo condition (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Negative affect is associated with diminished benefit during a trial of opioid therapy and is predictive of dropout in a controlled clinical trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schema of the study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Low, Moderate, and High Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) groups and average pain intensity ratings based on in-clinic (P = 0.03) and at-home (P = 0.03) diary data (N = 415).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Low, Moderate, and High groups on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and mean ratings on the Roland–Morris Disability Scale (N = 410; P = 0.001).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Low, Moderate, High groups on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and symptom ratings on the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) (N = 414; P = 0.05).

References

    1. Garofalo JP, Polatin P. Low back pain: an epidemic in industrialized countries. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC, editors. Psychosocial Factors in Pain: Clinical Perspectives. New York: The Guilford Press; 1999. pp. 164–174.
    1. Fordyce WE. Back Pain in the Workplace: Management of Disability in Nonspecific conditions. Seattle: IASP Press; 1995. - PubMed
    1. Ehrlich GE. Back pain. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2003;67:26–31. - PubMed
    1. Frymoyer JW, Cats-Baril WL. An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22:263–271. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Consensus Report. Washington DC: Jun 29, 2011. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research.

Publication types