Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 8:13:53.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-53.

Diversity and ambivalence in general practitioners' attitudes towards preventive health checks - a qualitative study

Affiliations

Diversity and ambivalence in general practitioners' attitudes towards preventive health checks - a qualitative study

Anne Søndergaard et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Systematic preventive health checks in primary care have been introduced in several countries. The Danish Health Service does not provide this service, but health checks are nevertheless being conducted unsystematically. Very little is known about the GPs' experience with this service.The purpose of our study is to describe GPs' attitudes towards and concerns about providing preventive health checks and to describe their experiences with the health checks that they provide in daily practice.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted based on three semi-structured focus group interviews with 16 GPs from Central Region, Denmark. The focus group interviews took place at the Department of Public Health, Section for General Practice, Aarhus University in November 2010.

Results: We found that the participating GPs all conducted some kind of preventive health checks, but also that there was great diversity in the content. The GPs were somewhat ambivalent towards health checks. Many GPs found the service beneficial for the patients. Concurrently, they had reservations about promoting ill-health, they questioned whether the health checks were a core mission of primary care, and they were concerned whether the health checks would benefit the "right" patients. The GPs felt a need for further documentation of the benefits for the patients before a possible future implementation of systematic health checks. Some GPs found that health checks could be performed in other settings than general practice.

Conclusions: Our study revealed that health checks are performed differently. Their quality differs, and the GPs perform the health check based on their personal attitude towards this service and prevention in general. Our analysis suggests that the doctors are basically uncertain about the best approach. Our study also uncovers the GPs' reservations about inducing negative psychological reactions and decreased well-being among the health check participants. Further studies are needed to disclose where these concerns emerge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chamnan P, Simmons RK, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ, Griffin SJ. Estimating the population impact of screening strategies for identifying and treating people at high risk of cardiovascular disease: modelling study. BMJ. 2010;340:c1693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1693. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amoroso C, Harris MF, Ampt A, Laws RA, McKenzie S, Williams AM. et al.The 45 year old health check - feasibility and impact on practices and patient behaviour. Aust Fam Physician. 2009;38(5):358–362. - PubMed
    1. Krogsbøll LT, Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC. Skal befolkningen tilbydes generelle helbredsundersøgelser? Ugeskr Laeger. 2011;173(23):1671. - PubMed
    1. Hagerup A. Hvor uenige er de egentlig? Ugeskr Laeger. 2009;15:1255.
    1. Forebyggelseskommissionen. Vi kan leve længere og sundere : Forebyggelseskommissionens anbefalinger til en styrket forebyggende indsats. Kbh: Forebyggelseskommissionen; 2009.

MeSH terms