Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jun 8:12:141.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-141.

Usefulness and acceptability of a standardised orientation and mobility training for partially-sighted older adults using an identification cane

Judith Ballemans  1 , G A Rixt Zijlstra, Ger H M B van Rens, Jan S A G Schouten, Gertrudis I J M Kempen
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Usefulness and acceptability of a standardised orientation and mobility training for partially-sighted older adults using an identification cane

Judith Ballemans et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Orientation and mobility (O&M) training in using an identification (ID) cane is provided to partially-sighted older adults to facilitate independent functioning and participation in the community. Recently, a protocolised standardised O&M-training in the use of the ID cane was developed in The Netherlands. The purpose of this study is to assess the usefulness and acceptability of both the standardised training and the regular training for participants and O&M-trainers in a randomised controlled trial (NCT00946062).

Methods: The standardised O&M-training consists of two structured face-to-face sessions and one telephone follow-up, in which, in addition to the regular training, self-management and behavioural change techniques are applied. Questionnaires and interviews were used to collect data on the training's usefulness, e.g. the population reached, self-reported benefits or achievements, and acceptability, e.g. the performance of the intervention according to protocol and participants' exposure to and engagement in the training.

Results: Data was collected from 29 O&M-trainers and 68 participants. Regarding the self-reported benefits, outcomes were comparable for the standardised training and the regular training according the trainers and participants e.g., about 85% of the participants in both groups experienced benefits of the cane and about 70% gained confidence in their capabilities. Participants were actively involved in the standardised training. Nearly 40% of the participants in the standardised training group was not exposed to the training according to protocol regarding the number of sessions scheduled and several intervention elements, such as action planning and contracting.

Conclusions: The standardised and regular O&M-training showed to be useful and mostly acceptable for the partially-sighted older adults and trainers. Yet, a concern is the deviation from the protocol of the standardised O&M-training by the O&M-trainers regarding distinguishing elements such as action planning. Overall, participants appreciated both trainings and reported benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of progress of participants and the data collection in the process evaluation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Elliott DB, Trukolo-Ilic M, Strong JG, Pace R, Plotkin A, Bevers P. Demographic characteristics of the vision-disabled elderly. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(12):2566–2575. - PubMed
    1. Turano KA, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Munoz B, Rubin GS, West S. Association of visual field loss and mobility performance in older adults: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81(5):298–307. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000134903.13651.8e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brody BL, Gamst AC, Williams RA, Smith AR, Lau PW, Dolnak D, Rapaport MH, Kaplan RM, Brown SI. Depression, visual acuity, comorbidity, and disability associated with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(10):1893–1900. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00754-0. discussion 1900–1891. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Boer MR, Moll AC, de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Volker-Dieben HJ, van Rens GH. Psychometric properties of vision-related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24(4):257–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00187.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Owsley C, McGwin G. Association between visual attention and mobility in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(11):1901–1906. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52516.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data