Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 8:12:142.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-142.

A reduction in public funding for fertility treatment--an econometric analysis of access to treatment and savings to government

Affiliations

A reduction in public funding for fertility treatment--an econometric analysis of access to treatment and savings to government

Georgina M Chambers et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Almost all assisted reproductive technology (ART) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatments performed in Australia are subsidized through the Australian Government's universal insurance scheme, Medicare. In 2010 restrictions on the amount Medicare paid in benefits for these treatments were introduced, increasing patient out-of-pocket payments for fresh and frozen embryo ART cycles and IUI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the policy on access to treatment, savings in Medicare benefits and the number of ART conceived children not born.

Methods: Pooled quarterly cross-sectional Medicare data from 2007 and 2011 where used to construct a series of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression models to evaluate the impact of the policy on access to treatment by women of different ages. Government savings in the 12 months after the policy was calculated as the difference between the predicted and observed Medicare benefits paid.

Results: After controlling for underlying time trends and unobserved factors the policy change reduced the number of fresh embryo cycles by almost 8600 cycles over 12 months (a 16% reduction in cycles, p < 0.001). The policy effect was greatest on women aged 40 years and older (38% reduction in cycles, p < 0.001). Younger women engaged in relatively more anticipatory behaviour by bringing forward their fresh cycles to 2009. Frozen embryo cycles, which are approximately one quarter of the cost of a fresh cycle, were only marginally impacted by the policy. Utilisation of IUI cycles were not impacted by the policy. After adjusting for anticipatory behaviour, $76 million in Medicare benefits was saved in the 12 months after the policy change (0.47% of annual Medicare benefits). Between 1200 and 1500 ART conceived children were not born in 2010 as a consequence of the policy.

Conclusions: The introduction of the policy resulted in a significant reduction in fresh ART cycles in the first 15 months after its introduction. Further evaluation on the long-term impact of the policy with regard access to treatment and on clinical practice, particularly the number of embryos transferred, is crucial to ensuring equitable access to fertility treatment and the health and welfare of ART children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ART treatment cycles and Medicare Benefits Scheme benefits, Australia 2011-2010. Source: Medicare online statistics: http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/provider/medicare/mbs.jsp#N10030.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of treatment cycles, all ages Australia 2007-2011. Source: Medicare service data provided by the Medicare Information Service Branch.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of patients undertaking 1 or more Fresh Cycles per year before and after the EMSNCap policy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage of patients undertaking 1 or more Frozen Cycles per year before and after the EMSNCap policy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1506–1512. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology. Fertil Steril. 2009. pp. 1520–1524. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(8):1851–1862. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq124. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang YA, Macaldowie A, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Sullivan EA. Assisted reproduction technology in Australia and New Zealand 2009. Assisted reproduction technology series no. 15. Cat. no. PER 51. Canberra: AIHW; 2011.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). 2009 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates. National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. Atlanta. USA: Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2011.

Publication types

MeSH terms