A reduction in public funding for fertility treatment--an econometric analysis of access to treatment and savings to government
- PMID: 22682009
- PMCID: PMC3464128
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-142
A reduction in public funding for fertility treatment--an econometric analysis of access to treatment and savings to government
Abstract
Background: Almost all assisted reproductive technology (ART) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatments performed in Australia are subsidized through the Australian Government's universal insurance scheme, Medicare. In 2010 restrictions on the amount Medicare paid in benefits for these treatments were introduced, increasing patient out-of-pocket payments for fresh and frozen embryo ART cycles and IUI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the policy on access to treatment, savings in Medicare benefits and the number of ART conceived children not born.
Methods: Pooled quarterly cross-sectional Medicare data from 2007 and 2011 where used to construct a series of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression models to evaluate the impact of the policy on access to treatment by women of different ages. Government savings in the 12 months after the policy was calculated as the difference between the predicted and observed Medicare benefits paid.
Results: After controlling for underlying time trends and unobserved factors the policy change reduced the number of fresh embryo cycles by almost 8600 cycles over 12 months (a 16% reduction in cycles, p < 0.001). The policy effect was greatest on women aged 40 years and older (38% reduction in cycles, p < 0.001). Younger women engaged in relatively more anticipatory behaviour by bringing forward their fresh cycles to 2009. Frozen embryo cycles, which are approximately one quarter of the cost of a fresh cycle, were only marginally impacted by the policy. Utilisation of IUI cycles were not impacted by the policy. After adjusting for anticipatory behaviour, $76 million in Medicare benefits was saved in the 12 months after the policy change (0.47% of annual Medicare benefits). Between 1200 and 1500 ART conceived children were not born in 2010 as a consequence of the policy.
Conclusions: The introduction of the policy resulted in a significant reduction in fresh ART cycles in the first 15 months after its introduction. Further evaluation on the long-term impact of the policy with regard access to treatment and on clinical practice, particularly the number of embryos transferred, is crucial to ensuring equitable access to fertility treatment and the health and welfare of ART children.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Socioeconomic disparities in access to ART treatment and the differential impact of a policy that increased consumer costs.Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):3111-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det302. Epub 2013 Aug 1. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23906901
-
Residential proximity to a fertility clinic is independently associated with likelihood of women having ART and IUI treatment.Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct 31;37(11):2662-2671. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac205. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 36112009 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(18):1-63. Epub 2006 Oct 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006. PMID: 23074488 Free PMC article.
-
Register data on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in Europe including a detailed description of ART in Denmark.Int J Androl. 2006 Feb;29(1):12-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00577.x. Int J Androl. 2006. PMID: 16466519 Review.
-
Growing body of evidence supports intrauterine insemination as first line treatment and rejects unfounded concerns about its efficacy, risks and cost effectiveness.JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019 Jan 31;23(1):62-67. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180073. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019. PMID: 30277707 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The association between reproductive health smartphone applications and fertility knowledge of Australian women.BMC Womens Health. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00912-y. BMC Womens Health. 2020. PMID: 32131809 Free PMC article.
-
Corifollitropin alfa versus follitropin beta: an economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial in women undergoing IVF/ICSI.Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020 Feb 22;10:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.01.002. eCollection 2020 Jun. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020. PMID: 32455172 Free PMC article.
-
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019 Aug;41(8):493-499. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693680. Epub 2019 Aug 26. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019. PMID: 31450256 Free PMC article.
-
Luteal Phase Support in IVF: Comparison Between Evidence-Based Medicine and Real-Life Practices.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Aug 18;11:500. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00500. eCollection 2020. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020. PMID: 33013681 Free PMC article.
-
A Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal support in in vitro fertilization.Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1019-1027. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex023. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28333318 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(8):1851–1862. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq124. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wang YA, Macaldowie A, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Sullivan EA. Assisted reproduction technology in Australia and New Zealand 2009. Assisted reproduction technology series no. 15. Cat. no. PER 51. Canberra: AIHW; 2011.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). 2009 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates. National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. Atlanta. USA: Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2011.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical