Bone graft substitutes: What are the options?
- PMID: 22682580
- DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2012.04.001
Bone graft substitutes: What are the options?
Retraction in
-
Retraction notice to “Bone graft substitutes: what are the options?” [The Surgeon 10 (2012) 230-239].Surgeon. 2013 Apr;11(2):115. Surgeon. 2013. PMID: 23616998 No abstract available.
Abstract
Currently, a number of bone grafting materials are available in the clinical setting to enhance bone regeneration, varying from autologous bone to several bone graft substitutes. Although autologous bone remains the "gold standard" for stimulating bone repair and regeneration, the morbidity from its harvesting and its restricted availability generated the need for the development of other materials or strategies either to substitute autologous bone graft or expand its limited supply. Bone graft substitutes can possess one or more components: an osteoconductive matrix, acting as a scaffold; osteoinductive proteins and other growth factors to induce differentiation and proliferation of bone-forming cells; and osteogenic cells for bone formation. Based on their distinct properties, all these bone grafting alternatives have specific indications, and can be used either alone or in combination. In this review, we summarise the available bone grafting materials, focussing mainly on the various bone substitutes and their characteristics, in an effort to specify the indications for their use.
Copyright © 2012 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Re: The article "Dinopoulos H, Dimitriou R, Giannoudis PV. Bone graft substitutes: what are the options? Surgeon. 2012 Aug;10(4):230-9.Surgeon. 2013 Oct;11(5):293. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Aug 6. Surgeon. 2013. PMID: 23932800 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
