Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 22683130
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60480-2
Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The effectiveness of quality improvement (QI) strategies on diabetes care remains unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of QI strategies on glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), vascular risk management, microvascular complication monitoring, and smoking cessation in patients with diabetes.
Methods: We identified studies through Medline, the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care database (from inception to July 2010), and references of included randomised clinical trials. We included trials assessing 11 predefined QI strategies or financial incentives targeting health systems, health-care professionals, or patients to improve management of adult outpatients with diabetes. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and appraised risk of bias.
Findings: We reviewed 48 cluster randomised controlled trials, including 2538 clusters and 84,865 patients, and 94 patient randomised controlled trials, including 38,664 patients. In random effects meta-analysis, the QI strategies reduced HbA(1c) by a mean difference of 0·37% (95% CI 0·28-0·45; 120 trials), LDL cholesterol by 0·10 mmol/L (0·05-0.14; 47 trials), systolic blood pressure by 3·13 mm Hg (2·19-4·06, 65 trials), and diastolic blood pressure by 1·55 mm Hg (0·95-2·15, 61 trials) versus usual care. We noted larger effects when baseline concentrations were greater than 8·0% for HbA(1c), 2·59 mmol/L for LDL cholesterol, and 80 mm Hg for diastolic and 140 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure. The effectiveness of QI strategies varied depending on baseline HbA(1c) control. QI strategies increased the likelihood that patients received aspirin (11 trials; relative risk [RR] 1·33, 95% CI 1·21-1·45), antihypertensive drugs (ten trials; RR 1·17, 1·01-1·37), and screening for retinopathy (23 trials; RR 1·22, 1·13-1·32), renal function (14 trials; RR 128, 1·13-1·44), and foot abnormalities (22 trials; RR 1·27, 1·16-1·39). However, statin use (ten trials; RR 1·12, 0·99-1·28), hypertension control (18 trials; RR 1·01, 0·96-1·07), and smoking cessation (13 trials; RR 1·13, 0·99-1·29) were not significantly increased.
Interpretation: Many trials of QI strategies showed improvements in diabetes care. Interventions targeting the system of chronic disease management along with patient-mediated QI strategies should be an important component of interventions aimed at improving diabetes management. Interventions solely targeting health-care professionals seem to be beneficial only if baseline HbA(1c) control is poor.
Funding: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care and the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (now Alberta Innovates--Health Solutions).
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Diabetes quality improvement: beyond glucose control.Lancet. 2012 Jun 16;379(9833):2218-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60637-0. Epub 2012 Jun 9. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22683133 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Review: quality improvement strategies reduce HbA(1c), LDL cholesterol, and BP in diabetes.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 16;157(8):JC4-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-8-201210160-02011. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 23070513 No abstract available.
-
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes management decrease HbA1c, cholesterol and blood pressure, and increase screening for disease complications.Evid Based Nurs. 2013 Jul;16(3):89-90. doi: 10.1136/eb-2012-100954. Epub 2013 Feb 14. Evid Based Nurs. 2013. PMID: 23412745 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous