Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 May;109(20):369-75.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0369. Epub 2012 May 18.

Perioperative point of care coagulation testing

Affiliations
Review

Perioperative point of care coagulation testing

Christian Friedrich Weber et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: Conventional laboratory tests of blood coagulation yield only partial diagnostic information. "Point of care" (POC) devices are increasingly being used at the bedside perioperatively for rapid, detailed testing of hemostatic function and for treatment monitoring in patients with coagulopathies. In this review, we discuss the benefits and limitations of POC coagulation testing-in particular, its effects on the rate of perioperative transfusion of allogeneic blood products, on the frequency of other types of hemostatic treatment, and on the clinical outcome.

Methods: This article is based on a selective review of pertinent literature retrieved by a search in PubMed.

Results: The clinical value of preoperative POC screening for coagulopathies has not yet been examined in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. On the other hand, studies in patients with coagulopathies undergoing (mainly cardiac) surgery have shown that algorithm-based hemostatic treatment based on viscoelastic POC coagulation testing reduces both perioperative blood loss and the rate of transfusion of allogeneic blood products. None of the studies published to date had adequate power to reveal any independent effect of POC coagulation testing on perioperative morbidity or mortality.

Conclusion: Despite certain limitations that must be borne in mind, POC techniques are a valuable means of testing various aspects of hemostasis rapidly and in detail. Their implementation in hemostatic treatment algorithms may reduce both the rate of transfusion of allogeneic blood products and the total cost of treatment for blood loss and coagulopathies. The putative effect of POC testing on perioperative morbidity and mortality has not yet been demonstrated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Malone DL, Dunne J, Tracy JK, Putnam AT, Scalea TM, Napolitano LM. Blood transfusion, independent of shock everity, is associated with worse outcome in trauma. J Trauma. 2003;54:898–905. - PubMed
    1. Vivacqua A, Koch CG, Yousuf AM, et al. Morbidity of bleeding after cardiac surgery: is it blood transfusion, reoperation for bleeding, or both? Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1780–1790. - PubMed
    1. Kozek-Langenecker S. Management of massive operative blood loss. Minerva Anestesiol. 2007;73:401–415. - PubMed
    1. Koscielny J, Ziemer S, Radtke H, et al. A practical concept for preoperative identification of patients with impaired primary hemostasis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2004;10:195–204. - PubMed
    1. Toulon P, Ozier Y, Ankri A, Fleron MH, Leroux G, Samama CM. Point-of-care versus central laboratory coagulation testing during haemorrhagic surgery. A multicenter study Thromb. Haemost. 2009;101:394–401. - PubMed

MeSH terms