Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012;7(6):e38660.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038660. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

Perception of loudness is influenced by emotion

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Perception of loudness is influenced by emotion

Erkin Asutay et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Loudness perception is thought to be a modular system that is unaffected by other brain systems. We tested the hypothesis that loudness perception can be influenced by negative affect using a conditioning paradigm, where some auditory stimuli were paired with aversive experiences while others were not. We found that the same auditory stimulus was reported as being louder, more negative and fear-inducing when it was conditioned with an aversive experience, compared to when it was used as a control stimulus. This result provides support for an important role of emotion in auditory perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Timeline of a single conditioning trial.
After the presentation of an auditory stimulus that was 5 seconds long tactile stimulus was presented. Between the onsets of two consecutive trials there were 11 seconds. Figure also shows the time windows in which EDA was scored.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Results.
(A) Mean EDA induced by auditory and tactile stimuli during conditioning phase shown for the two conditioning groups (CS+: 250 Hz vs. CS+: 2 kHz). SE is indicated. (B) Average EDA induced by CS+ and CS- in the conditioning phase (the two conditioning groups combined) at different trials. Standard errors of the means are indicated. (C) Interaction effect of conditioning group and sound on loudness (top), fear (middle) and valence (bottom) judgments. Main effects and grand means are removed. SE is indicated.

References

    1. Fodor JA. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1983. The modularity of mind.
    1. Stein BE, Stanford TR. Multisensory integration: Current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2008;9:255–266. - PubMed
    1. Bertelson P, Vroomen J, de Gelder B. Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification. Psychological Science. 2003;14:592–597. - PubMed
    1. Woods TM, Recanzone GH. Cross-modal interactions evidenced by the ventriloquism effect in humans and monkeys. In: Calvert GA, Spence C, Stein BA, editors. The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2004. pp. 35–48.
    1. Calvert GA, Campbell R, Brammer MJ. Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of cross-modal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. Current Biology. 2000;10:649–657. - PubMed

Publication types