Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty
- PMID: 22689809
- PMCID: PMC3413278
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.4772
Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty
Abstract
Purpose: We designed this study to evaluate the association of colonoscopy with colorectal cancer (CRC) death in the United States by site of CRC and endoscopist specialty.
Methods: We designed a case-control study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data. We identified patients (cases) diagnosed with CRC age 70 to 89 years from January 1998 through December 2002 who died as a result of CRC by 2007. We selected three matched controls without cancer for each case. Controls were assigned a referent date (date of diagnosis of the case). Colonoscopy performed from January 1991 through 6 months before the diagnosis/referent date was our primary exposure. We compared exposure to colonoscopy in cases and controls by using conditional logistic regression controlling for covariates, stratified by site of CRC. We determined endoscopist specialty by linkage to the American Medical Association (AMA) Masterfile. We assessed whether the association between colonoscopy and CRC death varied with endoscopist specialty.
Results: We identified 9,458 cases (3,963 proximal [41.9%], 4,685 distal [49.5%], and 810 unknown site [8.6%]) and 27,641 controls. In all, 11.3% of cases and 23.7% of controls underwent colonoscopy more than 6 months before diagnosis. Compared with controls, cases were less likely to have undergone colonoscopy (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.43); the association was stronger for distal (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.27) than proximal (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.64) CRC. The strength of the association varied with endoscopist specialty.
Conclusion: Colonoscopy is associated with a reduced risk of death from CRC, with the association considerably and consistently stronger for distal versus proximal CRC. The overall association was strongest if colonoscopy was performed by a gastroenterologist.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy versus colonoscopy for reduction of colorectal cancer mortality.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jul;34(7):1273-1281. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03300-7. Epub 2019 May 31. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019. PMID: 31152198 Free PMC article.
-
Colonoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Case-Control Study.Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 3;168(7):481-488. doi: 10.7326/M17-0723. Epub 2018 Mar 6. Ann Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29532085
-
Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jan 6;150(1):1-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-1-200901060-00306. Epub 2008 Dec 15. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19075198
-
Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Nov;17(11):2265-2300. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003927. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019. PMID: 31188154
-
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):1016-1030. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.174. Epub 2017 Jun 6. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28555630 Review.
Cited by
-
Endoscopic polypectomy for malignant polyps: Should tumor location (right versus left side) guide clinical decisions?Surgery. 2023 Mar;173(3):674-680. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.07.041. Epub 2022 Oct 18. Surgery. 2023. PMID: 36266122 Free PMC article.
-
Trouble in Paris (classification): polyp morphology is in the eye of the beholder.Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):188-91. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.411. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25567171
-
Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2595-609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6828. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27305518 Free PMC article.
-
Current and future colorectal cancer screening strategies.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug;19(8):521-531. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00612-y. Epub 2022 May 3. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 35505243 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Spontaneous Expulsion per Rectum of a Colorectal Polyp: A Rare and Unusual Case.Gastroenterology Res. 2018 Aug;11(4):329-332. doi: 10.14740/gr1054w. Epub 2018 Feb 8. Gastroenterology Res. 2018. PMID: 30116435 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–1477. - PubMed
-
- Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:1624–1633. - PubMed
-
- Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: Follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial—SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1310–1322. - PubMed
-
- Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, et al. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:389–394. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical