Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;15(8):863-9.
doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0417. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

A clinical decision support tool to predict survival in cancer patients beyond 120 days after palliative chemotherapy

Affiliations

A clinical decision support tool to predict survival in cancer patients beyond 120 days after palliative chemotherapy

Terence Ng et al. J Palliat Med. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Palliative chemotherapy is often administered to terminally ill cancer patients to relieve symptoms. Yet, unnecessary use of chemotherapy can worsen patients' quality of life due to treatment-related toxicities. Thus, accurate prediction of survival in terminally ill patients can help clinicians decide on the most appropriate palliative care for these patients. However, studies have shown that clinicians often make imprecise predictions of survival in cancer patients. Hence, the purpose of this study was to create a clinical decision support tool to predict survival in cancer patients beyond 120 days after palliative chemotherapy.

Materials and methods: Data were obtained from a retrospective study of 400 randomly selected terminally ill cancer patients in the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) from 2008 to 2009. After removing patients with missing data, there were 325 patients remaining for model development. Three classification algorithms, naive Bayes (NB), neural network (NN), and support vector machine (SVM) were used to create the models. A final model with the best prediction performance was then selected to develop the tool.

Results: The NN model had the best prediction performance. The accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) of this model were 78%, 82%, 74%, and 0.857, respectively. Five patient attributes (albumin level, alanine transaminase level (ATL), absolute neutrophil count, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, and number of metastatic sites) were included in the model.

Conclusions: A decision support tool to predict survival in cancer patients beyond 120 days after palliative chemotherapy was created. With further validation, this tool coupled with the professional judgment of clinicians can help improve patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Score scatter plot constructed using PCA. The black squares represent patients in the training set, whereas the gray circles represent patients in the validation set.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Simple clinical decision support tool for determining whether a patient will survive beyond 120 days after chemotherapy.

References

    1. Browner I. Carducci MA. Palliative chemotherapy: Historical perspective, applications, and controversies. Semin Oncol. 2005;32(2):145–155. - PubMed
    1. McCall K. Johnston B. Treatment options in end-of-life care: The role of palliative chemotherapy. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2007;13:486–488. - PubMed
    1. Glare P. Virik K. Jones M. Hudson M. Eychmuller S. Simes J. Christakis N. A systematic review of physicians' survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BMJ. 2003;327:195–198. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gripp S. Moeller S. Bolke E. Schmitt G. Matuschek C. Asgari S. Asgharzadeh F. Roth S. Budach W. Franz M. Willers R. Survival prediction in terminally ill cancer patients by clinical estimates, laboratory tests, and self-rated anxiety and depression. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3313–3320. - PubMed
    1. Chow E. Harth T. Hruby G. Finkelstein J. Wu J. Danjoux C. How accurate are physicians' clinical predictions of survival and the available prognostic tools in estimating survival times in terminally ill cancer patients? A systematic review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2001;13:209–218. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances