Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Dec;27(12):1594-601.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2122-5. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

Impact of lifestyle intervention and metformin on health-related quality of life: the diabetes prevention program randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of lifestyle intervention and metformin on health-related quality of life: the diabetes prevention program randomized trial

Hermes Florez et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Adults at high risk for diabetes may have reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Objective: To assess changes in HRQoL after interventions aimed at diabetes risk reduction.

Design, setting, and participants: A randomized clinical trial, the Diabetes Prevention Program, was conducted in 27 centers in the United States, in 3,234 non-diabetic persons with elevated fasting and post-load plasma glucose, mean age 51 years, mean BMI 34 Kg/m(2); 68 % women, and 45 % members of minority groups.

Interventions: Intensive lifestyle (ILS) program with the goals of at least 7 % weight loss and 150 min of physical activity per week, metformin (MET) 850 mg twice daily, or placebo (PLB).

Measurements: HRQoL using the 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) health survey to evaluate health utility index (SF-6D), physical component summaries (PCS) and mental component summaries (MCS). A minimally important difference (MID) was met when the mean of HRQoL scores between groups differed by at least 3 %.

Results: After a mean follow-up of 3.2 years, there were significant improvements in the SF-6D (+0.008, p=0.04) and PCS (+1.57, p<0.0001) scores in ILS but not in MET participants (+0.002 and +0.15, respectively, p=0.6) compared to the PLB group. ILS participants showed improvements in general health (+3.2, p<0.001), physical function (+3.6, p<0.001), bodily pain (+1.9, p=0.01), and vitality (+2.1, p=0.01) domain scores. Treatment effects remained significant after adjusting sequentially for baseline demographic factors, and for medical and psychological comorbidities. Increased physical activity and weight reduction mediated these ILS treatment effects. Participants who experienced weight gain had significant worsening on the same HRQoL specific domains when compared to those that had treatment-related (ILS or MET) weight loss. No benefits with ILS or MET were observed in the MCS score.

Conclusion: Overweight/obese adults at high risk for diabetes show small improvement in most physical HRQoL and vitality scores through the weight loss and increased physical activity achieved with an ILS intervention.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00004992.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Changes in physical function (1a) and general health (1b) scores across treatment groups. ILS, intensive lifestyle; PLB, Placebo; MET, Metformin. Data available in study participants decreased overtime from baseline (n = 3206) to year 1 (n = 3143), year 2 (n = 2988), year 3 (n = 2941), and year 4 (n = 1859).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Changes in physical function (2a), general health (2b), body pain (2c), and vitality (2d) scores among lifestyle intervention participants over the DPP follow-up period and according to weight (Wt) change categories. *P < 0.001 for a comparison of the Wt. gain category with any of the Wt. loss categories.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Changes in physical function (3a), general health (3b), body pain (3c), and vitality (3d) scores among metformin intervention participants over the DPP follow-up period and according to weight (Wt) change categories. *P < 0.01 for a comparison between the Wt. gain category and the major Wt. loss category.

References

    1. US Department of Health and Human Services (DHSS). In: Healthy people 2020. Washington; 2010. Available at http://healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicId=8 Accessed May 18, 2012.
    1. Goldney RD, Phillips PJ, Fisher LJ, Wilson DH. Diabetes, depression, and quality of life: a population study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1066–1070. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1066. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manuel DG, Schultz SE. Health-related quality of life and health-adjusted life expectancy of people with diabetes in Ontario, Canada, 1996–1997. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(2):407–414. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2.407. - DOI - PubMed
    1. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group Quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients is affected by complications but not by intensive policies to improve blood glucose or blood pressure control (UKPDS 37) Diabetes Care. 1999;22(7):1125–1136. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.7.1125. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Redekop WK, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten GE, Wolffenbuttel BH, Stolk RP, Niessen LW. Resource consumption and costs in Dutch patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Results from 29 general practices. Diabet Med. 2002;19(3):246–253. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00654.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data