Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;2(1):3-8.
doi: 10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

Drain vs No Drain After Colorectal Surgery

Affiliations

Drain vs No Drain After Colorectal Surgery

Shingo Tsujinaka et al. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

In colorectal surgery, drains are expected to prevent hematoma, fluid collection, or abscess formation, to act as an indicator of postoperative complication, or to minimize the severity of complication-related symptoms. Routine drainage has not been advocated by meta-analyses as they failed to demonstrate any benefit in reducing anastomotic leak rate, minimizing symptoms, or serving as a warning function. Moreover, some reports even showed that drain itself is an independent risk factor of anastomosis. The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery has given further concern to this controversial issue, that the use of drain decreased anastomotic failure rate and the need for surgical re-intervention. While controversy still remains, the choice of using drain is left to the individual surgeon's preference in daily practice. Therefore, surgeons should be well acquainted with purpose of drainage (prophylaxis, information, or treatment), characteristics (materials), clinical application of drain (type of drainage system, timing of removal), surgical outcomes after using drain (incidence of postoperative complication), and drain-related complications. If drains are used, careful observation with proper use is crucial for the management. It is important that the duration of drainage should not be inadequately extended. Any complications directly associated with the use of drain should be avoided. New concepts of drain have been proposed as diagnostic tool using biomarkers, and as preventive device against anastomotic leak. This article overviews the available, published data on the use of drain in colorectal surgery.

Keywords: Anastomotic leak; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal surgery; Drain; Drainage; Risk factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Minor anastomotic leak. A narrow, meandered extravasation of contrast solution around the anastomosis is observed. A small amount of contrast flows into the tip of drain located in the presacral space, indicating this drainage is effective
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Contrast enema: fecal fistula and the healing process. a At the time of diagnosis of leak. The contrast massively flows into the drain. b 4 weeks after diagnosis of leak. The contrast does not flow into the drain. c 6 weeks after diagnosis of leak. The bowel continuity has been completely restored and the drain was removed successfully

References

    1. Averbach AM, Sugarbaker PH. The use of drains in elective surgery for colorectal cancer: always, never or selectively? Tumori. 1995;81(3 Suppl):89–97. - PubMed
    1. Tsujinaka S, Kawamura YJ, Konishi F, Maeda T, Mizokami K. Pelvic drainage for anterior resection revisited: use of drains in anastomotic leaks. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(6):461–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04535.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC. Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88(3):400–404. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01719.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Branagan G, Finnis D. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(5):1021–1026. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0869-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eberhardt JM, Kiran RP, Lavery IC. The impact of anastomotic leak and intra-abdominal abscess on cancer-related outcomes after resection for colorectal cancer: a case control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(3):380–386. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ad488. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources