Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 13:12:157.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-157.

Patient empowerment: the need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditions

Affiliations

Patient empowerment: the need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditions

Marion McAllister et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Health policy in the UK and elsewhere is prioritising patient empowerment and patient evaluations of healthcare. Patient reported outcome measures now take centre-stage in implementing strategies to increase patient empowerment. This article argues for consideration of patient empowerment itself as a directly measurable patient reported outcome for chronic conditions, highlights some issues in adopting this approach, and outlines a research agenda to enable healthcare evaluation on the basis of patient empowerment.

Discussion: Patient empowerment is not a well-defined construct. A range of condition-specific and generic patient empowerment questionnaires have been developed; each captures a different construct e.g. personal control, self-efficacy/self-mastery, and each is informed by a different implicit or explicit theoretical framework. This makes it currently problematic to conduct comparative evaluations of healthcare services on the basis of patient empowerment. A case study (clinical genetics) is used to (1) illustrate that patient empowerment can be a valued healthcare outcome, even if patients do not obtain health status benefits, (2) provide a rationale for conducting work necessary to tighten up the patient empowerment construct (3) provide an exemplar to inform design of interventions to increase patient empowerment in chronic disease. Such initiatives could be evaluated on the basis of measurable changes in patient empowerment, if the construct were properly operationalised as a patient reported outcome measure. To facilitate this, research is needed to develop an appropriate and widely applicable generic theoretical framework of patient empowerment to inform (re)development of a generic measure. This research should include developing consensus between patients, clinicians and policymakers about the content and boundaries of the construct before operationalisation. This article also considers a number of issues for society and for healthcare providers raised by adopting the patient empowerment paradigm.

Summary: Healthcare policy is driving the need to consider patient empowerment as a measurable patient outcome from healthcare services. Research is needed to (1) tighten up the construct (2) develop consensus about what is important to include (3) (re)develop a generic measure of patient empowerment for use in evaluating healthcare (4) understand if/how people make trade-offs between empowerment and gain in health status.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Payne K, McAllister M, Davies L. Valuing the economic benefits of complex interventions: when maximising health is not sufficient. Health Econ. 2012. [Epub ahead of print] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kleinmann A. The illness narratives: suffering, healing, and the human condition. Basic Books, US; 1988.
    1. Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient Participation in Decision-Making. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:329–39. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00059-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm. Pat Ed Counsel. 2005;57:153–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.05.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aujoulat I, D’Hoore W, Deccache A. Patient empowerment in theory and practice: Polysemy or cacophony? Pat Ed Counsel. 2007;66:13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.008. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types