Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 14;4(1):22.
doi: 10.1186/1758-2555-4-22.

ACL graft failure location differs between allografts and autografts

Affiliations

ACL graft failure location differs between allografts and autografts

Robert A Magnussen et al. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. .

Abstract

Background: Between 5 and 20% of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction fail and require revision. Animal studies have demonstrated slower incorporation of allograft tissue, which may affect the mechanism of graft failure. The purpose of this study is to determine the location of traumatic graft failure following ACL reconstruction and investigate differences in failure patterns between autografts and allografts.

Methods: The medical records of 34 consecutive patients at our center undergoing revision ACL reconstruction following a documented traumatic re-injury were reviewed. Graft utilized in the primary reconstruction, time from initial reconstruction to re-injury, activity at re-injury, time to revision reconstruction, and location of ACL graft tear were recorded.

Results: Median patient age at primary ACL reconstruction was 18.5 years (range, 13-39 years). The primary reconstructions included 20 autografts (13 hamstrings, 6 patellar tendons, 1 iliotibial band), 12 allografts (5 patellar tendon, 5 tibialis anterior tendons, 2 achilles tendons), and 2 unknown. The median time from primary reconstruction to re-injury was 1.2 years (range, 0.4 - 17.6 years). The median time from re-injury to revision reconstruction was 10.4 weeks (range, 1 to 241 weeks). Failure location could be determined in 30 patients. In the autograft group 14 of 19 grafts failed near their femoral attachment, while in the allograft group 2 of 11 grafts failed near their femoral attachment (p < 0.02).

Conclusions: When ACL autografts fail traumatically, they frequently fail near their femoral origin, while allograft reconstructions that fail are more likely to fail in other locations or stretch.

Level of evidence: Level III - Retrospective cohort study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An arthroscopic view of the femoral notch in a left knee demonstrating rupture of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft near its femoral attachment. The medial (MFC) and lateral (LFC) femoral condyles are labeled as is the synovium-covered posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).
Figure 2
Figure 2
An arthroscopic view of the femoral notch in a left knee demonstrating rupture of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft near its tibial attachment. The medial (MFC) and lateral (LFC) femoral condyles are labeled as is the synovium-covered posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).
Figure 3
Figure 3
An arthroscopic view of the femoral notch in a left knee demonstrating rupture of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft in its mid-substance. The medial (MFC) and lateral (LFC) femoral condyles are labeled as is the synovium-covered posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).
Figure 4
Figure 4
An arthroscopic view of the femoral notch in a left knee demonstrating stretching of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft in its mid-substance. The medial (MFC) and lateral (LFC) femoral condyles are labeled.
Figure 5
Figure 5
An arthroscopic view of the femoral notch in a left knee demonstrating disappearance of an ACL graft. The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and lateral femoral condyle (LFC) are labeled.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The distribution of autograft and allograft failure locations following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Autografts are noted to fail most frequently near their femoral origins.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McCulloch PC, Lattermann C, Boland AL, Bach BR. An illustrated history of anterior cruciate ligament surgery. J Knee Surg. 2007;20(2):95–104. - PubMed
    1. Fox JA, Pierce M, Bojchuk J, Hayden J, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach BR. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with nonirradiated fresh-frozen patellar tendon allograft. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(8):787–794. - PubMed
    1. George MS, Dunn WR, Spindler KP. Current concepts review: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(12):2026–2037. doi: 10.1177/0363546506295026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greis PE, Johnson DL, Fu FH. Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: causes of graft failure and technical considerations of revision surgery. Clin Sports Med. 1993;12(4):839–852. - PubMed
    1. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Revision anterior cruciate surgery with use of bone-patellar tendon-bone autogenous grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(8)):1131–1143. - PubMed