ACL graft failure location differs between allografts and autografts
- PMID: 22697165
- PMCID: PMC3411415
- DOI: 10.1186/1758-2555-4-22
ACL graft failure location differs between allografts and autografts
Abstract
Background: Between 5 and 20% of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction fail and require revision. Animal studies have demonstrated slower incorporation of allograft tissue, which may affect the mechanism of graft failure. The purpose of this study is to determine the location of traumatic graft failure following ACL reconstruction and investigate differences in failure patterns between autografts and allografts.
Methods: The medical records of 34 consecutive patients at our center undergoing revision ACL reconstruction following a documented traumatic re-injury were reviewed. Graft utilized in the primary reconstruction, time from initial reconstruction to re-injury, activity at re-injury, time to revision reconstruction, and location of ACL graft tear were recorded.
Results: Median patient age at primary ACL reconstruction was 18.5 years (range, 13-39 years). The primary reconstructions included 20 autografts (13 hamstrings, 6 patellar tendons, 1 iliotibial band), 12 allografts (5 patellar tendon, 5 tibialis anterior tendons, 2 achilles tendons), and 2 unknown. The median time from primary reconstruction to re-injury was 1.2 years (range, 0.4 - 17.6 years). The median time from re-injury to revision reconstruction was 10.4 weeks (range, 1 to 241 weeks). Failure location could be determined in 30 patients. In the autograft group 14 of 19 grafts failed near their femoral attachment, while in the allograft group 2 of 11 grafts failed near their femoral attachment (p < 0.02).
Conclusions: When ACL autografts fail traumatically, they frequently fail near their femoral origin, while allograft reconstructions that fail are more likely to fail in other locations or stretch.
Level of evidence: Level III - Retrospective cohort study.
Figures






Similar articles
-
[BTB allograft for revision surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament - part 2].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005;72(5):297-303. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005. PMID: 16316605 Czech.
-
Patient-Centered Outcomes and Revision Rate in Patients Undergoing ACL Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Compared With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allograft: A Matched Case-Control Study.Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec;31(12):2320-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Aug 12. Arthroscopy. 2015. PMID: 26276092
-
Does the type of graft affect the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? a meta-analysis of 32 studies.Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):714-723. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-0929.R2. Bone Joint J. 2017. PMID: 28566389 Review.
-
Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia.Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2319-28. doi: 10.1177/0363546514548164. Epub 2014 Sep 8. Am J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 25201444
-
Meta-analysis of the Risk of Infections After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by Graft Type.Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1500-1508. doi: 10.1177/0363546517714450. Epub 2017 Jul 24. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 28737955
Cited by
-
Change in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Choice and Outcomes Over Time.Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov;33(11):2007-2014. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Aug 26. Arthroscopy. 2017. PMID: 28847572 Free PMC article.
-
On the heterogeneity of the femoral enthesis of the human ACL: microscopic anatomy and clinical implications.J Exp Orthop. 2016 Dec;3(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40634-016-0050-8. Epub 2016 Jul 13. J Exp Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27412665 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of femoral tunnel exit on the 3D graft bending angle in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.J Exp Orthop. 2021 Jun 25;8(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00364-9. J Exp Orthop. 2021. PMID: 34173071 Free PMC article.
-
[The killer turn in the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: mechanism and improvement].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 15;34(6):787-792. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201907066. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32538573 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
-
Fatigue-driven compliance increase and collagen unravelling in mechanically tested anterior cruciate ligament.Commun Biol. 2023 May 26;6(1):564. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04948-2. Commun Biol. 2023. PMID: 37237052 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McCulloch PC, Lattermann C, Boland AL, Bach BR. An illustrated history of anterior cruciate ligament surgery. J Knee Surg. 2007;20(2):95–104. - PubMed
-
- Fox JA, Pierce M, Bojchuk J, Hayden J, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach BR. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with nonirradiated fresh-frozen patellar tendon allograft. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(8):787–794. - PubMed
-
- Greis PE, Johnson DL, Fu FH. Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: causes of graft failure and technical considerations of revision surgery. Clin Sports Med. 1993;12(4):839–852. - PubMed
-
- Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Revision anterior cruciate surgery with use of bone-patellar tendon-bone autogenous grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(8)):1131–1143. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials