Procedural complications of central venous catheter insertion
- PMID: 22699699
Procedural complications of central venous catheter insertion
Abstract
Background: Central venous catheters (CVC) have complication rates as high as 20% and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In this study we wished to determine the incidence of procedural related complications at different venous access sites as well as the impact of ultrasound (US) use, operator experience and level of supervision of trainees in a prospective observational study.
Methods: Five hundred consecutive patients undergoing elective CVC insertion were prospectively followed. Data with regards to US use, operator experience, level of supervision, site of insertion and procedural complications were collected.
Results: The overall rate of procedural complications was 19.5%. Operators with <25 insertions caused significantly more complications (25.2% vs. 13.6%). Arterial punctures occurred significantly more frequently when US was not used (7.2 vs. 2.1%) and at the subclavian site (8% vs. 1.6%). Higher levels of supervision were significantly associated with a decreased number of complications (10.7% vs. 23.8%). Subclavian vein as access point for the CVC resulted in significantly more overall complications (29.2% vs. 17.7%). Inexperienced operators combined with SCV approach were significant predictors for increased procedural-related complications.
Conclusion: Immediate procedural-related complications during CVC insertion are common. To reduce the incidence of procedural-related complications we advocate multiple strategies to assure central venous cannulation safety: 1) the internal jugular vein should be the primary target vessel; 2) trainees with <25 previous catheter insertions should be supervised at all times; 3) ultrasound may reduce the incidence of procedural-related complications.
Comment in
-
Does experience trump technology? The case of US guidance and CVC placement.Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Nov;78(11):1202-4. Epub 2012 Jul 6. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012. PMID: 22772853 No abstract available.
-
What else regarding central vascular access placement.Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Apr;79(4):452. Epub 2012 Dec 20. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013. PMID: 23254168 No abstract available.
-
Training and supervision remain the key.Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Apr;79(4):453. Epub 2013 Jan 10. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013. PMID: 23306404 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources