[Risk factors for failed cleansing following periprosthetic delayed hip prosthesis infection]
- PMID: 22699757
- DOI: 10.1007/s00132-012-1936-5
[Risk factors for failed cleansing following periprosthetic delayed hip prosthesis infection]
Abstract
Background: Despite extensive cleansing concepts recurrent infections are relatively common especially for infections of hip prostheses. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify factors which hinder cleansing and facilitate recurrence.
Materials and methods: This study included 40 patients with periprosthetic delayed hip prosthesis infection who had been treated with the aim of infection cleansing between 2006 and 2008. Infection cleansing was carried out using a standardized treatment regimen with two and multiple phase reimplantation of the hip prosthesis following successful pathogen eradication. A clinical course follow-up was carried out after 2 years.
Results: Of the patients 18 (45%) were free of recurrence following successful eradication and reimplantation of the prosthesis and 5 (12.5%) suffered recurrence of infection after primarily successful revision prosthesis. In 17 patients (42.5%) treatment was switched to an alternative procedure primarily due to an uncleansable infection. In the group of patients with recurrent infections or untreatable infection, resistant pathogens could be detected significantly more often (p=0.001), in particular methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) and highly resistant Pseudomonas. This group had a significantly worse American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.002). The number of surgical interventions in this group was significantly higher.
Conclusions: A poorer general physical condition and resistant infectious pathogens are the main risk factors for recurrent infections following prosthesis reimplantation. Therefore, a different treatment concept should be used for polymorbid patients with resistant pathogen infections.
Similar articles
-
Risk factors for failed two-stage procedure after chronic posttraumatic periprosthetic hip infections.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Mar;133(3):421-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-012-1673-6. Epub 2012 Dec 21. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013. PMID: 23263011
-
Treatment of periprosthetic hip infection caused by resistant microorganisms using 2-stage reimplantation protocol.J Arthroplasty. 2009 Dec;24(8):1264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jun 12. J Arthroplasty. 2009. PMID: 19523784
-
Improved treatment strategies can result in better outcomes following one-stage exchange surgery for MRSA periprosthetic joint infection.J Med Microbiol. 2020 Aug;69(8):1100-1104. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001229. Epub 2020 Jul 8. J Med Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32639225
-
[Replacement of infected knee and hip endoprostheses].Chirurg. 2010 Apr;81(4):310-20. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1842-5. Chirurg. 2010. PMID: 20361365 Review. German.
-
The challenge of methicillin resistant staphylococcal infection after total hip replacement: overlooked or overstated?Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11 Supple A):60-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34333. Bone Joint J. 2014. PMID: 25381410 Review.
Cited by
-
Intravenous drug abuse is a risk factor in the failure of two-stage treatment for infected total hip arthroplasty.Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017 Dec;33(12):623-629. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 3. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 29132552 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of total knee replacement following explantation and cemented spacer therapy.GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2016 Mar 24;5:Doc12. doi: 10.3205/iprs000091. eCollection 2016. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2016. PMID: 27066391 Free PMC article.
-
[Etiology and classification of septic coxitis].Unfallchirurg. 2012 Nov;115(11):967-71. doi: 10.1007/s00113-012-2202-3. Unfallchirurg. 2012. PMID: 23097133 German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical