Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:374398.
doi: 10.1155/2012/374398. Epub 2012 May 30.

Negative pressure wound therapy literature review of efficacy, cost effectiveness, and impact on patients' quality of life in chronic wound management and its implementation in the United kingdom

Affiliations

Negative pressure wound therapy literature review of efficacy, cost effectiveness, and impact on patients' quality of life in chronic wound management and its implementation in the United kingdom

Diaa Othman. Plast Surg Int. 2012.

Abstract

This is a paper reviewing the National Health Service (NHS) agenda in relation to the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in chronic wound management and assesses the evidence behind it, its cost effectiveness and the outcome it has on patients' satisfaction and life style. Multiple studies over the last 10 years looking at clinical efficacy of NPWT with its cost effectiveness and the implementation of this service in the UK were reviewed. NPWT has showed a reasonable body of evidence to support its usage in chronic wounds with potential positive outcomes on finance and patients' satisfaction. However, the NHS system shows significant variations in the availability and implementation of this useful tool, depending on care providers and resources availabilities. The paper concluded that the NPWT can be a useful source of cutting down costs of chronic wound managements and saving money by its effect on expediting wound healing, which can address a part of the financial crises facing the NHS, however, has to be considered according to specific case needs. There should also be a national standard for the availability and indication of this tool to assure equal opportunities for different patients in different areas in the country.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Coombes R. The NHS debate. British Medical Journal. 2008;337, article a628 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pollock AM, Price D. How the secretary of state for health proposes to abolish the NHS in England. British Medical Journal. 2011;342(7801) - PubMed
    1. Bunt L, Harris M. The human factor; How transforming healthcare to involve the public can save money and save lives. 2009, http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/the-human-factor.pdf.
    1. Walker S, Mason AR, Claxton K, et al. Value for money and the quality and outcomes framework in primary care in the UK NHS. British Journal of General Practice. 2010;60(574):e213–e220. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Department of Health. High Quality Care for All.DoH. London, UK, 2008, http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/docu....

LinkOut - more resources