Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;44(3):357-61.
doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.96321.

Comparative evaluation of intrathecal midazolam and low dose clonidine: efficacy, safety and duration of analgesia. A randomized, double blind, prospective clinical trial

Suchita A Joshi  1 , Venkatesh V Khadke, Rajesh D Subhedar, Arun W Patil, Vijay M Motghare
Affiliations

Comparative evaluation of intrathecal midazolam and low dose clonidine: efficacy, safety and duration of analgesia. A randomized, double blind, prospective clinical trial

Suchita A Joshi et al. Indian J Pharmacol. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: The study was planned to assess the comparative efficacy, safety and duration of analgesia produced by low-dose clonidine and midazolam when used as adjuvant for spinal anesthesia.

Materials and methods: This is a randomized, participant and observer blind, prospective, parallel group clinical trial. Fifty ASA grade I and II patients posted for lower abdominal surgery were randomly allocated into two groups. BC group received spinal clonidine 30 μg and BM group received preservative-free midazolam 2 mg with 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine. Postoperative analgesia, analgesic requirement in 24 hours, onset and duration of block, hemodynamic stability and adverse effects were observed (P<0.05 - considered significant, P<0.01 considered highly significant).

Results: The duration of postoperative analgesia was prolonged in BM group (391.64 ± 132.98 min) than BC group (296.60 ± 52.77 min) (P<0.01). The mean verbal rating pain score was significantly less in BM group than BC group (P<0.01). The number of analgesic doses in 24 hours were significantly less in BM group (P<0.05). Nine patients (36%) in BC group required additional analgesia as against none in BM group (P<0.01). The onset of sensory block and peak sensory level was significantly earlier in BM group as compared to BC group. Duration of sensory block was longer in BM group (P<0.05). Subjects in BC group(36%) had bradycardia as compared to none in BM group (P<0.01). Hypotension was observed in 44% patients in BC group as against 16% in BM group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Postoperative analgesia with clonidine is short lived with some bradycardia. Intrathecal midazolam provides superior analgesia without clinically relevant adverse effects.

Keywords: Spinal anesthesia; hyperbaric bupivacaine; intrathecal clonidine; intrathecal midazolam; lower abdominal surgery; postoperative analgesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Duncan MA, Savage J, Tucker AP. Prospective audit comparing intrathecal analgesia (incorporating midazolam) with epidural and analgesia after major open abdominal surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:558–62. - PubMed
    1. Saxena AK, Arava S. Current concepts in neuraxial administration of opioid and non-opioid: An overview and future perspectives. Indian J Anaesth. 2004;48:13–24.
    1. Kim MH, Lee YM. Intrathecal midazolam increased the analgesic effect of spinal blockade with bupivacaine in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86:77–9. - PubMed
    1. Gupta A, Prakash S, Deshpande S, Kale K. The effect of intrathecal midazolam 2.5 mg with hyperbaric bupivacaine on postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgry. Internet J Anesthesiol. 2007;14:11.
    1. Fogarty DJ, Carabine UA, Milligan KR. Comparison of the analgesic effects of intrathecal clonidine and intrathecal morphine after spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Br J Anaesth. 1993;71:661–4. - PubMed