Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012;7(6):e37970.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037970. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

Strong association between two polymorphisms on 15q25.1 and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Strong association between two polymorphisms on 15q25.1 and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Mingliang Gu et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Background: The association between polymorphisms on 15q25.1 and lung cancer has been widely evaluated; however, the studies have yielded contradictory results. We sought to investigate this inconsistency by performing a comprehensive meta-analysis on two polymorphisms (CHRNA3 gene: rs1051730 and AGPHD1 gene: rs8034191) on 15q25.1.

Methods: Data were extracted from 15 and 14 studies on polymorphisms rs1051730 and rs8034191 involving 12301/14000 and 14075/12873 lung cancer cases/controls, respectively. The random-effects model was applied, addressing heterogeneity and publication bias.

Results: The two polymorphisms followed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for all studies (P>0.05). For rs1051730-G/A, carriers of A allele had a 36% increased risk for lung cancer (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-1.46; P<0.0005), without heterogeneity (P = 0.258) or publication bias (P(Egger) = 0.462). For rs8034191-T/C, the allelic contrast indicated that C allele conferred a 23% increased risk for lung cancer (95% CI: 1.08-1.4; P = 0.002), with significant heterogeneity (P<0.0005), without publication bias (P(Egger) = 0.682). Subgroup analyses suggested that the between-study heterogeneity was derived from ethnicity, study design, matched information, and lung cancer subtypes. For example, the association of polymorphisms rs1051730 and rs8034191 with lung cancer was heterogeneous between Caucasians (OR = 1.32 and 1.22; 95% CI: 1.25-1.44 and 1.05-1.42; P<0.0005 and 0.008, respectively) and East Asians (OR = 1.51 and 1.03; 95% CI: 0.76-3 and 0.47-2.27; P = 0.237 and 0.934, respectively) under the allelic model, and this association was relatively strengthened under the dominant model. There was no observable publication bias for both polymorphisms.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that CHRNA3 gene rs1051730-A allele and AGPHD1 gene rs8034191-T allele might be risk-conferring factors for the development of lung cancer in Caucasians, but not in East-Asians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts: Xuezhi Zhang is an employee of China Petrochemical Corporation. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram of search strategy and study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Funnel and filled funnel plots for studies investigating the effect of CHRNA3 gene polymorphism rs1051730 (A and B) and AGPHD1 gene polymorphism rs8034191 (C and D) on the risk of lung cancer.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Meta-regression of smoking percent in lung cancer patients on in-allele risk estimates of CHRNA3 gene rs1051730 (A) and AGPHD1 gene rs8034191 (B) polymorphisms for occurrence of lung cancer.
For each study, OR is shown by the middle of the blue solid circle whose upper and lower extremes represent the corresponding 95% CI. OR values were calculated for the current smokers against nonsmokers (including former smokers) when available or ex-smokers against never-smokers otherwise. The green dotted line is plotted by fitting OR and smoking percent in cases for the included studies.

References

    1. Shibuya K, Mathers CD, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJ. Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site: II. Results for the global burden of disease 2000. BMC Cancer. 2002;2:37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herbst RS, Heymach JV, Lippman SM. Lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1367–1380. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu H, Spitz MR, Amos CI, Shete S. Complex segregation analysis reveals a multigene model for lung cancer. Hum Genet. 2005;116:121–127. - PubMed
    1. Heller G, Zielinski CC, Zochbauer-Muller S. Lung cancer: from single-gene methylation to methylome profiling. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2010;29:95–107. - PubMed
    1. Amos CI, Wu X, Broderick P, Gorlov IP, Gu J, et al. Genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility locus for lung cancer at 15q25.1. Nat Genet. 2008;40:616–622. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources