Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 15:10:123.
doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-123.

The impact of laser ablation on optical soft tissue differentiation for tissue specific laser surgery-an experimental ex vivo study

Affiliations

The impact of laser ablation on optical soft tissue differentiation for tissue specific laser surgery-an experimental ex vivo study

Florian Stelzle et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Background: Optical diffuse reflectance can remotely differentiate various bio tissues. To implement this technique in an optical feedback system to guide laser surgery in a tissue-specific way, the alteration of optical tissue properties by laser ablation has to be taken into account. It was the aim of this study to evaluate the general feasibility of optical soft tissue differentiation by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy under the influence of laser ablation, comparing the tissue differentiation results before and after laser intervention.

Methods: A total of 70 ex vivo tissue samples (5 tissue types) were taken from 14 bisected pig heads. Diffuse reflectance spectra were recorded before and after Er:YAG-laser ablation. The spectra were analyzed and differentiated using principal component analysis (PCA), followed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA). To assess the potential of tissue differentiation, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity was computed for each pair of tissue types before and after laser ablation, and compared to each other.

Results: Optical tissue differentiation showed good results before laser exposure (total classification error 13.51%). However, the tissue pair nerve and fat yielded lower AUC results of only 0.75. After laser ablation slightly reduced differentiation results were found with a total classification error of 16.83%. The tissue pair nerve and fat showed enhanced differentiation (AUC: 0.85). Laser ablation reduced the sensitivity in 50% and specificity in 80% of the cases of tissue pair comparison. The sensitivity of nerve-fat differentiation was enhanced by 35%.

Conclusions: The observed results show the general feasibility of tissue differentiation by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy even under conditions of tissue alteration by laser ablation. The contrast enhancement for the differentiation between nerve and fat tissue after ablation is assumed to be due to laser removal of the surrounding lipid-rich nerve sheath. The results create the basis for a guidance system to control laser ablation in a tissue-specific way.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental set-up for optical measurements: 1) Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy before laser ablation, 2) Tissue ablation with an Er:YAG laser (spot size ø 4 mm), 3) Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy in the area of ablation (a. Spectrometer, b. Pulsed xenon lamp, c. Reflection/backscattering probe, d. Tissue sample (pig, ex vivo), e. Er:YAG laser).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histological slice of ablated skin: The ablation crater formula image had range of depth of 350 to 500 μm on all soft tissue types used in this study. The superficial epithelium of the skin was removed by the laser ablation uncovering sub-epithelial tissue layers. A very small darkened margin is detectable on the surface of the ablated area, indicating minimal carbonization formula image (Staining: H.E., magnification: 2,5x).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diffuse reflectance spectra before ablation; Mean Standard Deviation of Measurements within the same tissue type: 7.238.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Diffuse reflectance spectra after ablation; Mean Standard Deviation of Measurements within the same tissue type: 7.216.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Centered and scaled diffuse reflectance spectra before ablation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Centered and scaled diffuse reflectance spectra after ablation.

References

    1. Minton JP. The laser in surgery. A 23 year perspective. Am J Surg. 1986;151:725–729. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90052-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boppart SA, Herrmann J, Pitris C, Stamper DL, Brezinski ME, Fujimoto JG. High-resolution optical coherence tomography-guided laser ablation of surgical tissue. J Surg Res. 1999;82:275–284. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1998.5555. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuttenberger JJ, Stubinger S, Waibel A, Werner M, Klasing M, Ivanenko M, Hering P, Von Rechenberg B, Sader R, Zeilhofer HF. Computer-guided CO2-laser osteotomy of the sheep tibia: technical prerequisites and first results. Photomed Laser Surg. 2008;26:129–136. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2139. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stopp S, Svejdar D, von Kienlin E, Deppe H, Lueth TC. A new approach for creating defined geometries by navigated laser ablation based on volumetric 3-D data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55:1872–1880. - PubMed
    1. Spinelli P, Calarco G, Mancini A, Ni XG. Operative colonoscopy in cancer patients. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2006;15:339–347. doi: 10.1080/13645700601038036. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources