The Gold Standard Programme: smoking cessation interventions for disadvantaged smokers are effective in a real-life setting
- PMID: 22705716
- PMCID: PMC3812829
- DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050194
The Gold Standard Programme: smoking cessation interventions for disadvantaged smokers are effective in a real-life setting
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the real-life effect of an evidence-based Gold Standard Programme (GSP) for smoking cessation interventions in disadvantaged patients and to identify modifiable factors that consistently produce the highest abstinence rates.
Design: Observational prospective cohort study.
Setting: GSPs in pharmacies, hospitals and communities in Denmark, reporting to the national Smoking Cessation Database.
Participants: Disadvantaged patients, defined as patients with a lower level of education and those receiving unemployment benefits.
Interventions: 6-week manualised GSP smoking cessation interventions performed by certified staff.
Main outcome measures: 6 months of continuous abstinence, response rate: 80%.
Results: Continuous abstinence of the 16 377 responders was 34% (of all 20 588 smokers: 27%). Continuous abstinence was lower in 5738 smokers with a lower educational level (30% of responders and 23% of all) and in 840 unemployed (27% of responders and 19% of all). In respect to modifiable factors, continuous abstinence was found more often after programmes in one-on-one formats (vs group formats) among patients with a lower educational level, 34% (vs 25%, p=0.037), or among unemployed, 35% (vs 24%, p=0.099). The variable 'format' stayed in the final model of multivariable analyses in patients with a lower educational level, OR=1.31 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.63).
Conclusions: Although continuous abstinence was lower among disadvantaged smokers, the absolute difference was small. If the programme had been as effective in disadvantaged as in non-disadvantaged groups, there would have been an extra 46 or 8 quitters annually, respectively. Promoting individual interventions among those with a low education may increase the effectiveness of GSP.
Keywords: Smoking; health disparities; health inequalities; nationwide database; smoking cessation intervention.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Browning KK, Ferketich AK, Salsberry PJ, et al. Socioeconomic disparity in provider-delivered assistance to quit smoking. Nicotine Tob Res 2008;10:55–61 - PubMed
-
- Hiscock R, Judge K, Bauld L. Social inequalities in quitting smoking: what factors mediate the relationship between socioeconomic position and smoking cessation? J Public Health (Oxf) 2010;33:39–47 - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization WHO Report On The Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2009: Implementing Smoke-Free Environments. 2009. http://www.who.int/tobacco/mpower/en/
-
- Amos A, Amos A, Bauld L, et al. 2011. Tobacco Control, Inequalities In Health And Action At A Local Level. York: Public Health Research Consortium, 2011
-
- Cahill K, Stead LF, Lancaster T. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(4):CD006103. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical