Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Oct;116(10):916-22.
doi: 10.1007/s00113-012-2216-x.

[Comparison of MRI and CT for assessment of childhood fractures: studies on a porcine model]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[Comparison of MRI and CT for assessment of childhood fractures: studies on a porcine model]

[Article in German]
J D Moritz et al. Unfallchirurg. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capacity of MRI to achieve a diagnostic accuracy in pediatric fracture diagnosis comparable to CT.

Material and methods: In an ex vivo study design, simulating pediatric skeletal trauma, 248 limb bones of 9 dead young pigs with intact soft tissue were fractured. The samples were examined in a 1.5 T MRI with T1-weighted SE sequences. A standard scanning protocol was chosen for 64 multislice CT. CT results served as the reference standard.

Results: A total of 168 fractures were found. Seven fractures were missed by MRI, whereas another six ones were detected solely by MRI. The fracture type was the same in 137, partially the same in 12, and different in 6 cases. The dislocation was the same in 137, partially the same in 13, and different in 5 fractures. All differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: MRI has a diagnostic accuracy in fracture diagnosis comparable to CT. Therefore, protocols of traumatology in infancy should be revised.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009 Aug;17(3):439-50, v - PubMed
    1. Emerg Radiol. 2008 Nov;15(6):391-8 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Oct;191(4):995-1001 - PubMed
    1. Clin Imaging. 2009 Sep-Oct;33(5):379-83 - PubMed
    1. Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Feb;36(2):145-51 - PubMed