Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Dec 10;164(2):125-37.
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.05.052. Epub 2012 Jun 15.

Challenges in design and characterization of ligand-targeted drug delivery systems

Affiliations
Review

Challenges in design and characterization of ligand-targeted drug delivery systems

Silvia Muro. J Control Release. .

Abstract

Targeting of therapeutic agents to molecular markers expressed on the surface of cells requiring clinical intervention holds promise to improve specificity of delivery, enhancing therapeutic effects while decreasing potential damage to healthy tissues. Drug targeting to cellular receptors involved in endocytic transport facilitates intracellular delivery, a requirement for a number of therapeutic goals. However, after several decades of experimental design, there is still considerable controversy on the practical outcome of drug targeting strategies. The plethora of factors contributing to the relative efficacy of targeting makes the success of these approaches hardly predictable. Lack of fully specific targets, along with selection of targets with spatial and temporal expression well aligned to interventional requirements, pose difficulties to this process. Selection of adequate sub-molecular target epitopes determines accessibility for anchoring of drug conjugates and bulkier drug carriers, as well as proper signaling for uptake within the cell. Targeting design must adapt to physiological variables of blood flow, disease status, and tissue architecture by accommodating physicochemical parameters such as carrier composition, functionalization, geometry, and avidity. In many cases, opposite features need to meet a balance, e.g., sustained circulation versus efficient targeting, penetration through tissues versus uptake within cells, internalization within endocytic compartment to avoid efflux pumps versus accessibility to molecular targets within the cytosol, etc. Detailed characterization of these complex physiological factors and design parameters, along with a deep understanding of the mechanisms governing the interaction of targeted drugs and carriers with the biological environment, are necessary steps toward achieving efficient drug targeting systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Drug Targeting Strategies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Levels of Drug Targeting
Figure 3
Figure 3
Selection of the Target
Figure 4
Figure 4
Lack of total specificity (left) and uniformity (right) of target expression.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of targeting drug carriers to different epitopes of a target.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Endocytosis of the Target Temporarily Hinders its Access by Targeting Systems.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Endocytosis and vesicular transport
Figure 8
Figure 8
Coupling of the Drug to the Targeting Moiety.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Effect of size and shape on the cell interaction of ICAM-1 targeted carriers.

References

    1. Dingemanse J, Appel-Dingemanse S. Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46(9):713–737. - PubMed
    1. Takimoto CH. Basic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic principles. Cancer Treat Res. 2001;106:85–101. - PubMed
    1. Torchilin VP. Drug targeting. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2000;11(Suppl 2):S81–91. - PubMed
    1. Kohler G, Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature. 1975;256(5517):495–497. - PubMed
    1. Hoffman AS. The origins and evolution of “controlled” drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2008;132(3):153–163. - PubMed

Publication types