Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Jun;112(6):840-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.01.023.

Development of a brief questionnaire to assess habitual beverage intake (BEVQ-15): sugar-sweetened beverages and total beverage energy intake

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Development of a brief questionnaire to assess habitual beverage intake (BEVQ-15): sugar-sweetened beverages and total beverage energy intake

Valisa E Hedrick et al. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Energy-containing beverages, specifically sugar-sweetened beverages, may contribute to weight gain and obesity development. Yet, no rapid assessment tools are available which quantify habitual beverage intake (grams, energy) in adults.

Objective: Determine the factorial validity of a newly developed beverage intake questionnaire (BEVQ) and identify potential to reduce items.

Methods: Participants from varying economic and educational backgrounds (n=1,596, age 43±12 years, body mass index [calculated as kg/m(2)] 31.5±0.2) completed a 19-item BEVQ (BEVQ-19). Beverages that contributed <10% to total beverage, or sugar-sweetened beverages, energy and grams were identified for potential removal. Factor analyses identified beverage categories that could potentially be combined. Regression analyses compared BEVQ-19 outcomes with the reduced version's (BEVQ-15) variables. Inter-item reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α. Following BEVQ-15 development, a subsequent study (n=70, age 37±2 years; body mass index 24.5±0.4) evaluated the relative validity of the BEVQ-15 through comparison of three 24-hour dietary recalls' beverage intake.

Results: Three beverage items were identified for elimination (vegetable juice, meal replacement drinks, and mixed alcoholic drinks); beer and light beer were combined into one category. Regression models using BEVQ-15 variables explained 91% to 99% of variance in the four major outcomes of the BEVQ-19 (all P<0.001). Cronbach's α ranged .97 to .99 for all outcomes. In the follow-up study, BEVQ-15 and three 24-hour dietary recalls' variables were significantly correlated with the exception of whole milk; BEVQ-15 sugar-sweetened beverages (R(2)=0.69), and total beverage energy (R(2)=0.59) were more highly correlated with three 24-hour dietary recalls' than previously reported for the BEVQ-19. The BEVQ-15 produced a lower readability score of 4.8, which is appropriate for individuals with a fourth-grade education or greater.

Conclusions: The BEVQ-19 can be reduced to a 15-item questionnaire. This brief dietary assessment tool will enable researchers and practitioners to rapidly (administration time of ∼2 minutes) assess habitual beverage intake, and to determine possible associations of beverage consumption with health-related outcomes, such as weight status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Brief 15-Item Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEVQ-15)*† *Scoring instructions are available from the corresponding author upon request. Sunny Delight, Sunny Delight Beverages Co., Cincinnati, Ohio; Crystal Light, Kraft Foods, Inc., Northfield, Illinois; Red Bull, Red Bull, Fuschl am See Austria; Rockstar, Rockstar Energy Drink, Las Vegas, Nevada; Gatorade, PepsiCo, Purchase, New York; Powerade, Coca-Cola Company, Atlanta, Georgia
Figure 2
Figure 2
a: Comparison of BEVQ-19 and BEVQ-15: Total Beverage and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage (SSB) Grams b: Comparison of BEVQ-19 and BEVQ-15: Total Beverage and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage (SSB) Energy

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Almiron-Roig E, Drewnowski A. Hunger, thirst, and energy intakes following consumption of caloric beverages. Physiol Behav. 2003;79(4–5):767–773. - PubMed
    1. DellaValle DM, Roe LS, Rolls BJ. Does the consumption of caloric and non-caloric beverages with a meal affect energy intake? Appetite. 2005;44(2):187–193. - PubMed
    1. DiMeglio D, Mattes R. Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight. Int J Obes. 2000;24(6):794–800. - PubMed
    1. Mattes R. Dietary compensation by humans for supplemental energy provided as ethanol or carbohydrate in fluids. Physiol Behav. 1996;59(1):179–187. - PubMed
    1. Flegal K, Carroll M, Ogden C, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among U.S. adults, 1999–2008. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303(3):235–241. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances