Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 1;142(7):1899-1907.
doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2012.01.024.

Adaptive Isotonic Estimation of the Minimum Effective and Peak Doses in the Presence of Covariates

Affiliations

Adaptive Isotonic Estimation of the Minimum Effective and Peak Doses in the Presence of Covariates

Changfu Xiao et al. J Stat Plan Inference. .

Abstract

We consider a problem of estimating the minimum effective and peak doses in the presence of covariates. We propose a sequential strategy for subject assignment that includes an adaptive randomization component to balance the allocation to placebo and active doses with respect to covariates. We conclude that either adjusting for covariates in the model or balancing allocation with respect to covariates is required to avoid bias in the target dose estimation. We also compute optimal allocation to estimate the minimum effective and peak doses in discrete dose space using isotonic regression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Optimal allocation to estimate the peak dose. The solid line is the proportion assigned to the true peak dose, dτ, the dotted line proportion assigned to dK and the dashed line proportion assigned to dτ−1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Optimal allocation to estimate the MED. The solid line is the proportion assigned to the true MED, dτ, the dotted line proportion assigned to placebo d0, the dashed line proportion assigned to dτ−1 and the dotted-dashed line to dτ+1

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atkinson AC. Optimum biased-coin designs for sequential treatment allocation with covariate information with discussion. Statistics in Medicine. 1999;18:1741–1755. - PubMed
    1. Babb J, Rogatko A, Zacks S. Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. Statistics in Medicine. 1998;17:1103–1120. - PubMed
    1. Bekele BN, Ji Y, Shen Y, Thall PF. Monitoring late-onset toxicities in phase I trials using predicted risks. Biostatistics. 2008;9:442–457. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berry DA, Müller P, Grieve AP, Smith M, Parke T, Blazek R, Mitchard N, Krams M. Adaptive Bayesian designs for dose-ranging drug trials. In: Gatsonis C, Kass RE, Carlin B, Carriquiry A, Gelman A, Verdinelli I, West M, editors. Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics V. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001. pp. 99–181.
    1. Bretz F, Pinheiro JC, Branson M. Combining multiple comparisons and modeling techniques in dose-Response studies. Biometrics. 2005;61:738–748. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources