Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Jun 20:12:64.
doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-64.

Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: an updated metanalysis of the scientific evidence

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: an updated metanalysis of the scientific evidence

Mario Fioravanti et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: This is an update of a previous meta-analysis published in 2005.

Methods: It includes the data published up to march 2010 for a total of 247 papers and 18,300 cases. Cognitive deficits are examined in 5 different domains: Memory functioning (128 studies), Global cognitive functioning (131 studies), Language (70 studies), Executive function (67 studies), Attention (76 studies). Only controlled studies were included: patients vs. normal subjects.

Results: Results evidence that in all domains and in all different analyses performed within each domain, patients show a significant reduction of cognitive efficiency with respect to normal subjects. The between studies heterogeneity is very high in almost all domains. There are various sources of this heterogeneity (age, sex, sample size, type of patients, and type of measurement) which contribute to the high degree of not-overlapping information offered by the single studies.

Conclusions: Our results, based on the current scientific evidence, confirm the previous findings that there is a generalized impairment of various cognitive functions in patients with schizophrenia when compared to normal cases. The modalities with which these results are obtained have not changed over the years and the more recent studies do not modify the high heterogeneity previously found between the studies. This reduces the methodological quality of the results. In order to improve the methodological quality of the studies performed in the field of cognitive deficits of patients with schizophrenia, various factors should be taken into account and better managed in designing future studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Measures of Memory Efficiency.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Measures of memory functioning (inpatients only).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Measures of memory functioning (outpatients only).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Digit span.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Long term memory.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Short term memory.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Measures of IQ.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Measures of IQ.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Measures of IQ (outpatients only).
Figure 11
Figure 11
Premorbid IQ.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Verbal functioning.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Measures of cognitive flexibility.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Reaction time.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Attention (inpatients only).
Figure 16
Figure 16
Attention (outpatients only).

References

    1. Heinrichs RW, Zakzanis KK. Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia, a quantitative review of the evidence. Neuropsychol. 1998;12(Suppl 3):426–445. - PubMed
    1. Bilder RM, Lipschutz-Broch L, Reiter G, Geisler S, Mayerhoff D, Lieberman JA. Neuropsychological deficits in the early course of first episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 1991;5:198–199. doi: 10.1016/0920-9964(91)90071-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raji TK, Mulsant BH. Nature and course of cognitive function in late-life schizophrenia: a systematic review. Schizophr Res. 2008;102:122–140. - PubMed
    1. Mesholam-Gately RI, Giuliano AJ, Goff KP, Faraone SV, Seidman L. Neurocognition in first-episode schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychol. 2009;23:315–336. - PubMed
    1. Green MF. What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia? Am J Psych. 1996;153:32–330. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms