Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 20;486(7403):382-5.
doi: 10.1038/nature11178.

Electronic nematicity above the structural and superconducting transition in BaFe2(As(1-x)P(x))2

Affiliations

Electronic nematicity above the structural and superconducting transition in BaFe2(As(1-x)P(x))2

S Kasahara et al. Nature. .

Abstract

Electronic nematicity, a unidirectional self-organized state that breaks the rotational symmetry of the underlying lattice, has been observed in the iron pnictide and copper oxide high-temperature superconductors. Whether nematicity plays an equally important role in these two systems is highly controversial. In iron pnictides, the nematicity has usually been associated with the tetragonal-to-orthorhombic structural transition at temperature T(s). Although recent experiments have provided hints of nematicity, they were performed either in the low-temperature orthorhombic phase or in the tetragonal phase under uniaxial strain, both of which break the 90° rotational C(4) symmetry. Therefore, the question remains open whether the nematicity can exist above T(s) without an external driving force. Here we report magnetic torque measurements of the isovalent-doping system BaFe(2)(As(1-x)P(x))(2), showing that the nematicity develops well above T(s) and, moreover, persists to the non-magnetic superconducting regime, resulting in a phase diagram similar to the pseudogap phase diagram of the copper oxides. By combining these results with synchrotron X-ray measurements, we identify two distinct temperatures-one at T*, signifying a true nematic transition, and the other at T(s) (<T*), which we show not to be a true phase transition, but rather what we refer to as a 'meta-nematic transition', in analogy to the well-known meta-magnetic transition in the theory of magnetism.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Jun 3;106(22):227001 - PubMed
    1. Science. 2011 Jan 28;331(6016):439-42 - PubMed
    1. Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Oct 8;105(15):157003 - PubMed
    1. Phys Rev Lett. 2002 Apr 1;88(13):137005 - PubMed
    1. Science. 2010 Jan 8;327(5962):181-4 - PubMed

Publication types