Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Jun 22;13(1):50.
doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-13-50.

Measurement of asthma control according to Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines: a comparison with the Asthma Control Questionnaire

Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

Measurement of asthma control according to Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines: a comparison with the Asthma Control Questionnaire

José María Olaguibel et al. Respir Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a validated tool to measure asthma control. Cut-off points that best discriminate "well-controlled" or "not well-controlled" asthma have been suggested from the analysis of a large randomized clinical trial but they may not be adequate for daily clinical practice.

Aims: To establish cut-off points of the ACQ that best discriminate the level of control according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2006 guidelines in patients with asthma managed at Allergology and Pulmonology Departments as well as Primary Care Centers in Spain.

Patients and methods: An epidemiological descriptive study, with prospective data collection. Asthma control following GINA-2006 classification and 7-item ACQ was assessed. The study population was split in two parts: 2/3 for finding the cut-off points (development population) and 1/3 for validating the results (validation population).

Results: A total of 1,363 stable asthmatic patients were included (mean age 38 ± 14 years, 60.3% women; 69.1% non-smokers). Patient classification according to GINA-defined asthma control was: controlled 13.6%, partially controlled 34.2%, and uncontrolled 52.3%. The ACQ cut-off points that better agreed with GINA-defined asthma control categories were calculated using receiver operating curves (ROC). The analysis showed that ACQ < 0.5 was the optimal cut-off point for "controlled asthma" (sensitivity 74.1%, specificity 77.5%) and 1.00 for "uncontrolled asthma" (sensitivity 73%, specificity 88.2%). Kappa index between GINA categories and ACQ was 0.62 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The ACQ cut-off points associated with GINA-defined asthma control in a real-life setting were <0.5 for controlled asthma and ≥1 for uncontrolled asthma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Strobe flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Asthma control: 2a) According to GINA 2006 guidelines and 2b) In each step of the treatment.2a) Asthma control according to GINA 2006 (N = 855). 2b) Asthma control according to treatment step (N = 624).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Perception of asthma control according to patients’ and physicians’ perceptions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ACQ cut-off points obtained in the development and validation population.4a) Uncontrolled vs.controlled. 4b) Uncontrolled vs. partially controlled. 4c) ACQ-7 vs ACQ-5.

References

    1. Bousquet J, Khaltaev AN. Global surveillance, prevention and control of chronic respiratory diseases: a comprehensive approach. Global Alliance against Chronic Respiratory Diseases. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2007.
    1. Bousquet J, Kiley J, Bateman ED. et al.Prioritised research agenda for prevention and control of chronic respiratory diseases. Eur Respir J. 2010;36:995–1001. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00012610. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elward KS, Pollart SM. Medical Therapy for Asthma: Updates from the NAEPP Guidelines. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82:1242–1251. - PubMed
    1. Fredrickson DD, Molgaard CA, Dismuke SE, Schukman JS, Walling A. Understanding frequent emergency room use by Medicaid-insured children with asthma: a combined quantitative and qualitative study. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17:96–100. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.17.2.96. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bateman ED, Hurd SS, Barnes PJ. et al.Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary. Eur Respir J. 2008;31:143–178. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00138707. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms