Generic substitution of lamotrigine among medicaid patients with diverse indications: a cohort-crossover study
- PMID: 22731934
- PMCID: PMC3677951
- DOI: 10.2165/11634260-000000000-00000
Generic substitution of lamotrigine among medicaid patients with diverse indications: a cohort-crossover study
Abstract
Background: Controversy exists about the safety of substituting generic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Lamotrigine, the prototypical newer AED, is often used for psychiatric and neurological conditions other than epilepsy. The safety of generic substitution of lamotrigine in diverse populations of AED users is unclear.
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate potential associations between generic substitution of lamotrigine and adverse consequences in a population of diverse users of this drug.
Study design: This study was a retrospective cohort-crossover design using state Medicaid claims data from July 2006 through June 2009.
Methods: Subjects were included in the cohort if they converted from brand to generic lamotrigine and had 2 years of lamotrigine use prior to conversion. The frequency of emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations and condition-specific ED visits or hospitalizations were recorded in the 60 days immediately following the conversion to generic lamotrigine, then compared with the incidence of the same events during a randomly selected time period indexed to one of the patient's past refills of branded lamotrigine. Multivariate conditional logistic regression was used to quantify the association between generic conversion and health services utilization while controlling for changes in lamotrigine dose and concurrent drug use.
Results: Of the 616 unique subjects included in this analysis, epilepsy was the most common diagnosis (41%), followed by bipolar disorder (32%), pain (30%) and migraine (18%). Conversion to generic lamotrigine was not associated with a statistically significant increase in the odds of an ED visit (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92, 1.97), hospitalization (AOR = 1.21; 95% CI 0.60, 2.50) or condition-specific encounter (AOR 1.75; 95 CI 0.87, 3.51).
Conclusions: A statistically significant increase in ED visits, hospitalizations or condition-specific encounters was not observed following the switch from brand to generic lamotrigine, although a type II error cannot be ruled out.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Clinical and pharmacy utilization outcomes with brand to generic antiepileptic switches in patients with epilepsy.Epilepsia. 2011 Jul;52(7):1365-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03130.x. Epub 2011 Jun 21. Epilepsia. 2011. PMID: 21692778
-
Clinical consequences of generic substitution of lamotrigine for patients with epilepsy.Neurology. 2008 May 27;70(22 Pt 2):2179-86. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000313154.55518.25. Neurology. 2008. PMID: 18505997 Clinical Trial.
-
The economic consequences of generic substitution for antiepileptic drugs in a public payer setting: the case of lamotrigine.Dis Manag. 2007 Aug;10(4):216-25. doi: 10.1089/dis.2007.104649. Dis Manag. 2007. PMID: 17718660
-
Generic antiepileptic drugs-Safe or harmful in patients with epilepsy?Epilepsia. 2018 Jul;59(7):1273-1281. doi: 10.1111/epi.14439. Epub 2018 Jun 12. Epilepsia. 2018. PMID: 29894004 Review.
-
An update of the Hong Kong Epilepsy Guideline: consensus statement on the use of antiepileptic drugs in Hong Kong.Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Feb;23(1):74-88. doi: 10.12809/hkmj166027. Hong Kong Med J. 2017. PMID: 28184017 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Generic-to-Brand Switchback Rates Between Generic and Authorized Generic Drugs.Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Apr;37(4):429-437. doi: 10.1002/phar.1908. Epub 2017 Mar 20. Pharmacotherapy. 2017. PMID: 28152215 Free PMC article.
-
Rational use of generic psychotropic drugs.CNS Drugs. 2013 May;27(5):353-65. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0045-2. CNS Drugs. 2013. PMID: 23620145 Review.
-
The Impact of Generic Substitution on Health and Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Aug;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S21-33. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0147-0. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015. PMID: 26091709 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of generic exchange of solid oral dosage forms in neurological disorders: a systematic review.Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Apr;42(2):393-417. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01023-2. Epub 2020 Apr 9. Int J Clin Pharm. 2020. PMID: 32274633
-
Lamotrigine add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 22;2016(6):CD001909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001909.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 20;3:CD001909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001909.pub3. PMID: 27329345 Free PMC article. Updated.
References
-
- Haas JS, Phillips KA, Gerstenberger EP, et al. Potential savings from substituting generic drugs for brand-name drugs: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 1997–2000. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:891–7. - PubMed
-
- Shrank WH, Choudhry NK, Liberman JN, et al. The use of generic drugs in prevention of chronic disease is far more cost-effective than thought, and may save money. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30:1351–7. - PubMed
-
- Meredith P. Bioequivalence and other unresolved issues in generic drug substitution. Clin Ther. 2003;25:2875–90. - PubMed
-
- Davit BM, Nwakama PE, Buehler GJ, et al. Comparing generic and innovator drugs: a review of 12 years of bio-equivalence data from the United States Food and Drug Administration. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:1583–97. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous