Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jul;19(4):220-8.
doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2011.09.005.

Risks and outcomes of living donation

Affiliations
Review

Risks and outcomes of living donation

Krista L Lentine et al. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Living donors supply approximately 40% of renal allografts in the United States. Based on current data, perioperative mortality after donor nephrectomy is approximately 3 per 10,000 cases, and major and minor perioperative complications affect approximately 3% to 6% and 22% of donors, respectively. Donor nephrectomy does not appear to increase long-term mortality compared with controls, nor does it appear to increase ESRD risk among white donors. Within the donor population, the likelihood of postdonation chronic renal failure and medical comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes appears to be relatively higher among some donor subgroups, such as African Americans and obese donors, but the impact of uninephrectomy on the lifetime risks of adverse events expected without nephrectomy in these subgroups has not yet been defined. As national follow-up of living donors in the United States is limited in scope, duration, and completeness, additional methods for quantifying risk among diverse living donors are needed. In addition to improved national collection of follow-up data, possible sources of information on donor outcomes may include focused studies with carefully defined control groups, and database integration projects that link national donor registration records to other data sources. Given the growth and evolving characteristics of the living donor population, as well as changes in surgical techniques, tracking of short- and long-term risks after living kidney donation is vital to support truly informed consent and to maintain public trust in living donation. The transplant community must persist in their efforts to accurately assess risk across demographically diverse living kidney donors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures

Dr. Patel has no disclosures. The authors have no conflicts of interest related to this work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Terasaki PI, Cecka JM, Gjertson DW, Takemoto S. High survival rates of kidney transplants from spousal and living unrelated donors. The New England journal of medicine. 1995 Aug 10;333(6):333–336. - PubMed
    1. Klein AS, Messersmith EE, Ratner LE, Kochik R, Baliga PK, Ojo AO. Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1999–2008. Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr;10(4 Pt 2):973–986. - PubMed
    1. OTPN/HRSA. [Access Date June 1, 2011];National Data, Transplants by Donor Type. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/latestData/rptData.asp.
    1. Brown RS, Jr, Higgins R, Pruett TL. The evolution and direction of OPTN oversight of live organ donation and transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2009 Jan;9(1):31–34. - PubMed
    1. Graham W. Advisory Committee on Organ Transplantation (ACOT) Rockville, MD: Nov 13, 2008. Living donor follow-up data: Status report from the OPTN. https://www.team-psa.com/DOT/ACOT2008/presentations.asp.

Publication types

MeSH terms