Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jul;19(4):237-43.
doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2012.04.006.

Psychosocial and socioeconomic issues facing the living kidney donor

Affiliations
Review

Psychosocial and socioeconomic issues facing the living kidney donor

Mary Amanda Dew et al. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

At the 2010 Conference on Living Kidney Donor follow-up, a workgroup was convened to comment on the state of the evidence in 4 broad areas: (a) health-related quality of life postdonation; (b) donors' financial and economic concerns; (c) outcomes issues specific to newer areas of donation, namely, kidney exchange and anonymous (directed and nondirected) donation; and (d) the role of informed consent in relation to postdonation psychosocial outcomes. The workgroup sought to offer recommendations regarding research priorities for the next decade and data collection strategies to accomplish the needed research. The workgroup concluded that there has been little consideration of the nature or predictors of any long-term psychosocial outcomes in living donors. In some areas (eg, kidney exchange and anonymous donation), there is limited information on outcomes even in the early aftermath of donation. Across all 4 psychosocial areas, prospective studies are needed that follow donors to examine the course of development and/or resolution of any donation-related difficulties. The formation of a national registry to routinely collect psychosocial follow-up data may be an efficient strategy to monitor donor outcomes in both the short- and long-term years after donation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures to report.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abecassis M, Adams M, Adams P, et al. Live Organ Donor Consensus Group. Consensus statement on the live organ donor. JAMA. 2000;284(22):2919–2926. - PubMed
    1. Delmonico F. Council of the Transplantation Society. A report of the Amsterdam forum on the care of the live kidney donor: data and medical guidelines. Transplantation. 2005;79(6) suppl:S53–S66. - PubMed
    1. Dew MA, Jacobs C, Jowsey SG, Hanto R, Miller C, Delmonico FL UNOS. American Society of Transplant Surgeons; American Society of Transplantation. Guidelines for the psychosocial evaluation of living unrelated kidney donors in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(5):1047–1054. - PubMed
    1. Pruett TL, Tibell A, Alabdulkareem A, et al. The ethics statement of the Vancouver Forum on the live lung, liver, pancreas, and intestine donor. Transplantation. 2006;81(10):1386–1387. - PubMed
    1. Tong A, Chapman JR, Wong G, de Bruijn J, Craig JC. Screening and follow-up of living kidney donors: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Transplantation. 2011;92:962–972. - PubMed

Publication types