Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;88(9):765-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jun 23.

Birth weight- and fetal weight-growth restriction: impact on neurodevelopment

Iris G Streimish  1 , Richard A Ehrenkranz, Elizabeth N Allred, T Michael O'Shea, Karl C K Kuban, Nigel Paneth, Alan Leviton; ELGAN Study Investigators
Collaborators, Affiliations

Birth weight- and fetal weight-growth restriction: impact on neurodevelopment

Iris G Streimish et al. Early Hum Dev. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The newborn classified as growth-restricted on fetal weight curves, but not on birth weight curves, is classified prenatally as small for gestational age (SGA), but postnatally as appropriate for gestational age (AGA).

Aims: To see (1) to what extent the neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24 months corrected age differed among three groups of infants (those identified as SGA based on birth weight curves (B-SGA), those identified as SGA based on fetal weight curves only (F-SGA), and the referent group of infants considered AGA, (2) if girls and boys were equally affected by growth restriction, and (3) to what extent neurosensory limitations influenced what we found.

Study design: Observational cohort of births before the 28th week of gestation.

Outcome measures: Mental Development Index (MDI) and Psychomotor Development Index (PDI) of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II.

Results: B-SGA, but not F-SGA girls were at an increased risk of a PDI<70 (OR=2.8; 95% CI: 1.5, 5.3) compared to AGA girls. B-SGA and F-SGA boys were not at greater risk of low developmental indices than AGA boys. Neurosensory limitations diminished associations among girls of B-SGA with low MDI, and among boys B-SGA and F-SGA with PDI<70.

Conclusions: Only girls with the most severe growth restriction were at increased risk of neurodevelopmental impairment at 24 months corrected age in the total sample. Neurosensory limitations appear to interfere with assessing growth restriction effects in both girls and boys born preterm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have indicated that they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose, nor do they have any conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distributions of birth weight and estimated fetal. Weights are along the X-axis and the proportion of the sample along the Y-axis. Weights to the left of the solid vertical line are SGA by BW and EFW. Weights falling between the vertical solid and dashed lines are SGA by EFW standards only (Fetal-SGA). BW-SGA weights are to the left of the solid vertical line and AGA weights fall to the right of the dashed vertical line.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ehrenkranz RA. Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights: should the reference intrauterine growth curves based on birth weights be retired? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92:F161–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hutcheon JA, Platt RW. The missing data problem in birth weight percentiles and thresholds for “small-for-gestational-age”. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:786–92. - PubMed
    1. Mirghani HM, Weerasinghe S, Ezimokhai M, Smith JR. Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight at term: an evaluation of eight formulae. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005;31:409–13. - PubMed
    1. Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:80–9. - PubMed
    1. Sung IK, Vohr B, Oh W. Growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of very low birth weight infants with intrauterine growth retardation: comparison with control subjects matched by birth weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1993;123:618–24. - PubMed

Publication types