Which hospice patients with cancer are able to die in the setting of their choice? Results of a retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 22734023
- PMCID: PMC3402887
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.5711
Which hospice patients with cancer are able to die in the setting of their choice? Results of a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Purpose: To determine which hospice patients with cancer prefer to die at home and to define factors associated with an increased likelihood of dying at home.
Methods: An electronic health record-based retrospective cohort study was conducted in three hospice programs in Florida, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Main measures included preferred versus actual site of death.
Results: Of 7,391 patients, preferences regarding place of death were determined at admission for 5,837 (79%). After adjusting for other characteristics, patients who preferred to die at home were more likely to die at home (adjusted proportions, 56.5% v 37.0%; odds ratio [OR], 2.21; 95% CI, 1.77 to 2.76). Among those patients (n = 3,152) who preferred to die at home, in a multivariable logistic regression model, patients were more likely to die at home if they had at least one visit per day in the first 4 days of hospice care (adjusted proportions, 61% v 54%; OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.41), if they were married (63% v 54%; OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.44), and if they had an advance directive (65% v 50%; OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.54 to 2.65). Patients with moderate or severe pain were less likely to die at home (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.64), as were patients with better functional status (higher Palliative Performance Scale score: < 40, 64.8%; 40 to 70, 50.2%; OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.93; > 70, 40.5%; OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.82).
Conclusion: Increased hospice visit frequency may increase the likelihood of patients being able to die in the setting of their choice.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Comment in
-
Hospital can be the actively chosen place for death.J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 10;31(5):651-2. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.2556. Epub 2013 Jan 7. J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23295796 No abstract available.
-
Reply to D.C. Currow et al.J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 10;31(5):652. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.9411. J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23520646 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Are advance directives associated with better hospice care?J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Jun;62(6):1091-6. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12851. Epub 2014 May 22. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014. PMID: 24852308
-
Predictors of the final place of care of patients with advanced cancer receiving integrated home-based palliative care: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Oct 18;20(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00865-5. BMC Palliat Care. 2021. PMID: 34663303 Free PMC article.
-
Hospice assist at home: does the integration of hospice care in primary healthcare support patients to die in their preferred location - A retrospective cross-sectional evaluation study.Palliat Med. 2016 Jun;30(6):580-6. doi: 10.1177/0269216315626353. Epub 2016 Jan 26. Palliat Med. 2016. PMID: 26814216
-
Place of death of children and young adults with a life-limiting condition in England: a retrospective cohort study.Arch Dis Child. 2021 Jul 19;106(8):780-785. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319700. Arch Dis Child. 2021. PMID: 33355156 Free PMC article.
-
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4. BMC Geriatr. 2017. PMID: 29169346 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Not quite seamless: transitions between home and inpatient hospice.J Palliat Med. 2014 Apr;17(4):428-34. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0359. Epub 2014 Mar 4. J Palliat Med. 2014. PMID: 24592980 Free PMC article.
-
Stress among Care Givers: The Impact of Nursing a Relative with Cancer.Indian J Palliat Care. 2014 Jan;20(1):31-9. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.125554. Indian J Palliat Care. 2014. PMID: 24600180 Free PMC article.
-
Socioeconomic inequalities in the place of death in urban small areas of three Mediterranean cities.Int J Equity Health. 2020 Dec 3;19(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01324-y. Int J Equity Health. 2020. PMID: 33272290 Free PMC article.
-
The Hospice Information System and its association with the congruence between the preferred and actual place of death.Tzu Chi Med J. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):213-217. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_125_17. Tzu Chi Med J. 2017. PMID: 29296050 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between palliative chemotherapy and adult cancer patients' end of life care and place of death: prospective cohort study.BMJ. 2014 Mar 4;348:g1219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1219. BMJ. 2014. PMID: 24594868 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brazil K, Howell D, Bedard M, et al. Preferences for place of care and place of death among informal caregivers of the terminally ill. Palliat Med. 2005;19:492–499. - PubMed
-
- Pritchard RS, Fisher ES, Teno JM, et al. Influence of patient preferences and local health system characteristics on the place of death: SUPPORT investigators—Study to understand prognoses and preferences for risks and outcomes of treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:1242–1250. - PubMed
-
- Tang ST, McCorkle R. Determinants of place of death for terminal cancer patients. Cancer Invest. 2001;19:165–180. - PubMed
-
- Tang ST. When death is imminent: Where terminally ill patients with cancer prefer to die and why. Cancer Nurs. 2003;26:245–251. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources