Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2119-29.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0114.

The human socio-cognitive niche and its evolutionary origins

Affiliations
Review

The human socio-cognitive niche and its evolutionary origins

Andrew Whiten et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Hominin evolution took a remarkable pathway, as the foraging strategy extended to large mammalian prey already hunted by a guild of specialist carnivores. How was this possible for a moderately sized ape lacking the formidable anatomical adaptations of these competing 'professional hunters'? The long-standing answer that this was achieved through the elaboration of a new 'cognitive niche' reliant on intelligence and technology is compelling, yet insufficient. Here we present evidence from a diversity of sources supporting the hypothesis that a fuller answer lies in the evolution of a new socio-cognitive niche, the principal components of which include forms of cooperation, egalitarianism, mindreading (also known as 'theory of mind'), language and cultural transmission, that go far beyond the most comparable phenomena in other primates. This cognitive and behavioural complex allows a human hunter-gatherer band to function as a unique and highly competitive predatory organism. Each of these core components of the socio-cognitive niche is distinctive to humans, but primate research has increasingly identified related capacities that permit inferences about significant ancestral cognitive foundations to the five pillars of the human social cognitive niche listed earlier. The principal focus of the present study was to review and integrate this range of recent comparative discoveries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Principal classes of social cognition (in italic) in hunter–gatherer bands and inferred reinforcing relationships between them. For explanation and discussion, see text, especially §5.

References

    1. Boyd R., Silk J. 2009. How humans evolved, 5th edn New York, NY: Norton
    1. Erdal D., Whiten A. 1994. On human egalitarianism: an evolutionary product of Machiavellian status escalation? Curr. Anthropol. 35, 175–183 10.1086/204255 (doi:10.1086/204255) - DOI
    1. Erdal D., Whiten A. 1996. Egalitarianism and Machiavellian intelligence in human evolution. In Modelling the early human mind (eds Mellars P., Gibson K.), pp. 139–150 Cambridge, MA: McDonald Institute Monographs
    1. Marlowe F. W. 2005. Hunter–gatherers and human evolution. Evol. Anthropol. 14, 54–67 10.1002/evan.20046 (doi:10.1002/evan.20046) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Potts R. 1996. Humanity's descent: the consequences of ecological instability. New York, NY: Avon Books