Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 25;2(3):e001100.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001100. Print 2012.

Socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of stillbirths by cause: a population-based study

Sarah E Seaton  1 , David J Field, Elizabeth S Draper, Bradley N Manktelow, Gordon C S Smith, Anna Springett, Lucy K Smith
Affiliations

Socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of stillbirths by cause: a population-based study

Sarah E Seaton et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess time trends in socioeconomic inequalities in overall and cause-specific stillbirth rates in England.

Design: Population-based retrospective study.

Setting: England.

Participants: Stillbirths occurring among singleton infants born between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2007.

Main outcome measure: Cause-specific stillbirth rate per 10 000 births by deprivation tenth and year of birth. Deprivation measured using the UK index of multiple deprivation at Super Output Area level.

Methods: Poisson regression models were used to estimate the relative deprivation gap (comparing the most and least deprived tenths) in rates of stillbirths (overall and cause-specific). Excess mortality was calculated by applying the rates seen in the least deprived tenth to the entire population at risk. Discussions with our local NHS multicentre ethics committee deemed that this analysis of national non-identifiable data did not require separate ethics approval.

Results: There were 44 stillbirths per 10 000 births, with no evidence of a change in rates over time. Rates were twice as high in the most deprived tenth compared with the least (rate ratio (RR) 2.1, 95% CI 2.0 to 2.2) with no evidence of a change over time. There was a significant deprivation gap for all specific causes except mechanical events (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.5). The widest gap was seen for stillbirths due to antepartum haemorrhages (RR 3.1, 95% CI 2.8 to 3.5). No evidence of a change in the rate of stillbirth or deprivation gap over time was seen for any specific cause.

Conclusion: A wide deprivation gap exists in stillbirth rates for most causes and is not diminishing. Unexplained antepartum stillbirths accounted for 50% of the deprivation gap, and a better understanding of these stillbirths is necessary to reduce socioeconomic inequalities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of the deprivation gap explained by each specific cause.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Goldenberg R, McClure E, CBhutta Z, et al. Stillbirths: the vision for 2020. Lancet 2011;377:1798–805 - PubMed
    1. Flenady V, Middleton P, Smith GC, et al. Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries. Lancet 2011;377:1331–40 - PubMed
    1. Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE) Perinatal Mortality 2009. London: CMACE, 2010
    1. Lawn J, Blencowe H, Pattinson R, et al. Stillbirths: where? When? Why? How to make the data count? Lancet 2011;377:1448–63 - PubMed
    1. Guildea Z, Fone D, Dunstan F, et al. Social deprivation and the causes of stillbirth and infant mortality. Arch Dis Child 2001;84:307–10 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources