Risk assessment of endocrine active chemicals: identifying chemicals of regulatory concern
- PMID: 22735369
- DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.06.013
Risk assessment of endocrine active chemicals: identifying chemicals of regulatory concern
Abstract
The European regulation on plant protection products (1107/2009) (EC, 2009a), the revisions to the biocides Directive (COM[2009]267) (EC, 2009b), and the regulation concerning chemicals (Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 'REACH') (EC.2006) only support the marketing and use of chemical products on the basis that they do not induce endocrine disruption in humans or wildlife species. In the absence of agreed guidance on how to identify and evaluate endocrine activity and disruption within these pieces of legislation a European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) task force was formed to provide scientific criteria that may be used within the context of these three legislative documents. The resulting ECETOC technical report (ECETOC, 2009a) and the associated workshop (ECETOC, 2009b) presented a science-based concept on how to identify endocrine activity and disrupting properties of chemicals for both human health and the environment. The synthesis of the technical report and the workshop report was published by the ECETOC task force (Bars et al., 2011a,b). Specific scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine activity and disrupting properties that integrate information from both regulatory (eco)toxicity studies and mechanistic/screening studies were proposed. These criteria combined the nature of the adverse effects detected in studies which give concern for endocrine toxicity with an understanding of the mode of action of toxicity so that adverse effects can be explained scientifically. A key element in the data evaluation is the consideration of all available information in a weight-of-evidence approach. However, to be able to discriminate chemicals with endocrine properties of low concern from those of higher concern (for regulatory purposes), the task force recognised that the concept needed further refinement. Following a discussion of the key factors at a second workshop of invited regulatory, academic and industry scientists (ECETOC, 2011), the task force developed further guidance, which is presented in this paper. For human health assessments these factors include the relevance to humans of the endocrine mechanism of toxicity, the specificity of the endocrine effects with respect to other potential toxic effects, the potency of the chemical to induce endocrine toxicity and consideration of exposure levels. For ecotoxicological assessments the key considerations include specificity and potency, but also extend to the consideration of population relevance and negligible exposure. It is intended that these complement and reinforce the approach originally described and previously published in this journal (Bars et al., 2011a,b).
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Science based guidance for the assessment of endocrine disrupting properties of chemicals.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Feb;59(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Sep 19. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011. PMID: 20858523
-
Risk assessment of 'endocrine substances': guidance on identifying endocrine disruptors.Toxicol Lett. 2013 Dec 16;223(3):287-90. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 10. Toxicol Lett. 2013. PMID: 24036001
-
ECETOC Florence workshop on risk assessment of endocrine substances, including the potency concept.Toxicol Lett. 2013 Dec 16;223(3):310-4. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.03.027. Epub 2013 Apr 1. Toxicol Lett. 2013. PMID: 23558296
-
FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.J Toxicol Environ Health. 1997 Apr 11;50(5):415-31. doi: 10.1080/00984109708983999. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1997. PMID: 9140462 Review.
-
Implications of research on endocrine disruption for the environmental risk assessment, regulation and monitoring of chemicals in the European Union.Environ Pollut. 2007 Mar;146(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.05.036. Epub 2006 Sep 20. Environ Pollut. 2007. PMID: 16996184 Review.
Cited by
-
Food safety in the 21st century.Biomed J. 2018 Apr;41(2):88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 May 21. Biomed J. 2018. PMID: 29866604 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ecotoxicological study of six drugs in Aliivibrio fischeri, Daphnia magna and Raphidocelis subcapitata.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Mar;27(9):9891-9900. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07592-8. Epub 2020 Jan 11. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020. PMID: 31925696
-
Regulatory decisions on endocrine disrupting chemicals should be based on the principles of endocrinology.Reprod Toxicol. 2013 Jul;38:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Feb 11. Reprod Toxicol. 2013. PMID: 23411111 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A computational approach to evaluate the androgenic affinity of iprodione, procymidone, vinclozolin and their metabolites.PLoS One. 2014 Aug 11;9(8):e104822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104822. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25111804 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical