Combined chemotherapy and radiation improves survival for node-positive endometrial cancer
- PMID: 22735786
- PMCID: PMC3479633
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.026
Combined chemotherapy and radiation improves survival for node-positive endometrial cancer
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes for women with node-positive endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus
Methods: Records were reviewed for 66 patients with Stage IIIC endometrioid adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1/1995 and 12/2009. Study inclusion required TAH, BSO and negative chest imaging. Papillary serous and clear cell histologies were excluded. Adjuvant treatment was external beam radiation (RT) alone in 18 patients (27%), combined chemotherapy and RT in 44 (67%), chemotherapy alone in 1 (2%), and no adjuvant therapy in 3 (5%). The median follow-up was 48 months.
Results: Of 66 patients, 56 (85%) had positive pelvic nodes only, 5 (8%) had positive para-aortic nodes only, and 5 (8%) had both. Of the 62 patients who received adjuvant RT, only 4 (6%) had an in-field recurrence, including 2 with residual disease after surgery. Disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival rates at 5 years were 71% and 81%, respectively. By adjuvant treatment modality, 5-year DFS and OS rates were 63% and 67% for RT alone and 79% and 90% for combined modality therapy (p=0.15 and p<0.01). On multivariate analysis, combined modality therapy significantly improved DFS (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.49, p<0.01) and OS (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.75, p=0.02) compared to adjuvant RT alone.
Conclusions: Compared to RT alone, combined modality therapy decreased recurrence and improved survival in patients with node-positive endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus. In addition, external beam RT resulted in excellent local and regional control. Future studies are needed to define the optimal chemotherapy regimen, sequencing, and radiation fields.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest Notification: None of the authors has financial interests to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Kurman RJ, et al. Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;40:55–65. - PubMed
-
- Piver MS, Lele SB, Barlow JJ, et al. Paraaortic lymph node evaluation in stage I endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;59:97–100. - PubMed
-
- Hicks ML, Piver MS, Puretz JL, et al. Survival in patients with paraaortic lymph node metastases from endometrial adenocarcinoma clinically limited to the uterus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26:607–11. - PubMed
-
- Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105:103–4. - PubMed
-
- Nelson G, Randall M, Sutton G, et al. FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma with metastases confined to pelvic lymph nodes: analysis of treatment outcomes, prognostic variables, and failure patterns following adjuvant radiation therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;75:211–4. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources